Principles of living a godly life [61] – The polarising dichotomy separating Christians and ‘outsiders’ [1]

‘…God, having sent His Son within resemblance of self-forfeiting flesh, and concerning no share and self-forfeiture, has condemned loss and self-forfeiture within the flesh, 4 in order that the judicial approval and rightwise acts of the Law are being made full and complete within us – the not walking around down from flesh but down from breath. 5 Because the down from the flesh are existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the flesh, but the down from the Breath [pneuma], that of the Breath [pneuma],’, (Romans 8 v 3b - 5). 

Paul is comparing how Christians and unbelievers ‘walk around’, comparing how these two groups are living their lives day-by-day, how they are conducting themselves in the situations and circumstances that they face moment-by-moment. He is not only talking about ‘justification’ or ‘standing judicially approved’ in front of God in terms of whether they are ultimately forgiven, acquitted and going to heaven or not. He is also talking about how people are behaving at this present time in their daily lives. 

There is a polarising dichotomy between Christians and unbelievers. We see it throughout Paul’s writings, as well as in the letters of John, and the gospels. In verse 4 and the following verses, this polarisation comes to the fore. When it comes to successfully living a godly life moment-by-moment, how are those within the Messiah described? Are they described as those walking around making the effort to observe the external written codes of Covenant law? No. They are described as – 

The not walking around down from flesh, but down from breath

The polarising difference is that unbelievers or ‘outsiders’ are walking around down from the flesh, down from the energies, desires and passions within the fabric of their fleshly constitution. Indeed, they are enslaved to these energies within their fleshly constitution, which move on the basis of the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture, loss and death. But Christians on the other hand are indwelt by the Breath of God moving on the basis of Life within the Messiah. Because of the sacrifice of the Messiah as the spotless Lamb of God, at this present time Christians are liberated away from enslavement to the principle of self-forfeiture, loss and death. They are not under the authority of external written codes of divine law but bond-slaves of the Messiah, exhorted to be walking around down from Breath, [pneuma], that is related to God and the heavenly realm. In this way ‘the judicial approval of the Law and rightwise acts of the Law are being made full and complete within them’, (verse 4), whereas  ‘outsiders’ or ‘unbelievers’, by walking around within the flesh, turn things ‘upside down’. ‘Oh that those turning you upside down will also cut themselves off’, (Galatians 5 v 12).  

Why is this the case? Why are unbelievers turning things upside down? Paul tells us in the next verse. ‘Because the down from the flesh are existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the flesh, but the down from the Breath [pneuma], that of the Breath [pneuma], (Romans 8 v 5). There we see the polarisation working itself out in the different fundamental principles of behaviour of these two groups – 

The down from the flesh

Are existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the flesh

But

The down from the Breath

Are existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the Breath

Unbelievers are not persuaded concerning the Messiah. The gospel is foolishness as far as they are concerned, so they reject the good news of the Messiah and separate themselves away from it. This leads them to a process of becoming more and more ignorant of spiritual realities, even though they turn things upside down and think of themselves as wise. They increasingly lack perception concerning God. If they are religious-minded, they often exchange the Creator in favour of worshipping created things. If they are not religious-minded then they follow humanly constructed philosophies, (Romans 1 v 18 – 25). They focus their minds on the flesh – on their physical health and comfort, on sensual pleasurable experiences, on status, wealth and so on. One way or another they follow the impulses, passions, desires and instincts inherent in their fleshly constitution and that work themselves out into their speech and behaviour, (Romans 1 v 26 – 32). Even with those who possess the Sinai Covenant and divine Law, and who are diligently making the effort to work to observe the external written codes of the law to obtain or maintain divine approval, are walking down from the flesh, (Romans 2 v 17 – 27).

But thanks to the free gift of God, Christians are illuminated and persuaded concerning unseen heavenly realities and the Messiah, to the point of seeking to serve their Lord. They possess the Breath in their deep inner core as a free gift, the movement of the Breath working in opposition to the impulses of their flesh. Their enlightened minds focus on that of the Breath – on deliverance from condemnation, the allotted divine inheritance, behaving and speaking in a way that is pleasing to their Lord, and so on. They are placed in union with the Messiah by means of the Breath, and the Messiah, as their high priest, fills the law to completion on their behalf. 

Walking down from the Breath and existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the Breath such that divine law is made complete within Christians constitutes another of Paul’s general statements, and in the next few verses he goes on to explain what he means in more detail.

 

Principles of living a godly life [60] – The condemnation of self-forfeiture and completion of the law [2]

 ‘For the powerless incapable law, within which it is weak and feeble by means of the flesh, God, having sent His Son within resemblance of self-forfeiting flesh, and concerning no share and self-forfeiture, has condemned loss and self-forfeiture within the flesh, 4 in order that the judicial approval and rightwise acts of the Law are being made full and complete within us – the not walking around down from flesh, but down from breath’, [pneuma], (Romans 8 v 3, 4).

The outline that I presented in the previous post means that I dismiss the legalist’s suggestion that I am negating the Law or advocating opposition to divine Law so as to promote an excessively permissive Christian lifestyle. I am not saying that because Christians are now on the road to honour and praise that it therefore does not matter how they behave. Paul agrees. ‘Not at all’ says the Apostle, ‘just the opposite’. Rather, what divine Law approves of is beginning and continuing to be made full and complete within us. This is not something that has happened and been completed sometime in the past, rather it is a process that started in the past, when Christians were effectively brought forth and were indwelt by the set-apart Breath, and this process is continuing now and into the future. 

Some legalists step in once again. (They are a persistent and insistent bunch of people). Some of them propose that Paul is referring to something that was fully completed sometime in the past, because they then go on to emphasise a distinction between ‘Justification’ and ‘’Sanctification’. They say, ‘Yes, Christians have indeed been fully rescued and delivered in the Messiah. Their deliverance was fully accomplished and secured by the Messiah by means of his death and resurrection, and it was applied to individual Christians in the past when they were effectively brought forth or born again’. Their inference is that Christians have fully met the requirements of the Law in terms of their ultimate acquittal thanks to the work of Jesus. Christians stand as those who are declared judicially approved by means of the Messiah. They stand justified – judicially approved and rightwise in front of God by means of Jesus. Legalists say that in this sense their deliverance is sure and certain. But then they go on to say, ‘Now that a Christian has been brought forth or ‘born again’, they are called and exhorted to live a godly life in practice, day-by-day’. So far, so good, I fully agree. Like many of their fellow Christians, they refer to this ongoing godly service and process of increasing maturity in godliness as ‘sanctification’ – the process of change in which the Christian is increasingly set apart from worldliness. I refer to it as maintaining godliness and being rightwise in practice day-by-day. But then the legalist says, ‘This is where we turn to divine law! Not for justification, but for sanctification - for living a godly life day-by-day. Are you, as a Christian, stealing? What does Covenant law say? It says You will not steal’. That is the legalist’s approach.

But that is not what Paul is saying at all. Christians are not justified or judicially approved and made rightwise by entrusting Jesus only to then be sanctified or changed into the image of the Messiah day-by-day by turning to labouring and making the effort to obey the written codes of the (moral aspects of) divine law. Rather, the Apostle says that what the Messiah has done is in order that the ‘approval of the Law be made full and complete within us’. The fullness, completion or end result of divine law is now beginning to happen ‘within us’, rather than by our attempts to observe external written codes. If we are in any doubt as to what Paul means, he goes on to tell us plainly. First, this is certainly not something that is happening within the worldly arrangement, it is not arising within human nature in general. Second, it is not happening by attempts to conform to external written codes of law. Rather, it is happening only within Christians – ‘the not walking around down from flesh, but down from breath’.

So now we have this – 

Life within Jesus the Messiah down from Breath

Working in opposition to

Self-forfeiture, loss, and the death, down from flesh

Therefore, Christians who are living a godly life moment-by-moment are –

Walking around down from breath

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [59] – The condemnation of self-forfeiture and completion of the law [1]

 ‘For the powerless incapable law, within which it is weak and feeble by means of the flesh, God, having sent His Son within resemblance of self-forfeiting flesh, and concerning no share and self-forfeiture, has condemned loss and self-forfeiture within the flesh, 4 in order that the judicial approval of the Law is being made full and complete within us – the not walking around down from flesh, but down from breath’, [pneuma], (Romans 8 v 3, 4). 

Paul does not direct Christians to try to observe the written codes of Sinai Covenant law such as the Ten Commandments in the way legalists would have Christians do. Instead he points Christians to God’s free gift of His only-begotten Son. The free gift of the Son is the means of judicial approval. But legalists begin to qualify what Paul is saying. ‘Aha!’ they say. ‘When Paul talks about law, and when he talks about Christians dying away from law, (Romans 7 v 4), and being set free from the written code of Covenant law, (Romans 7 v 6), he means Ceremonial Law’. This is because legalists divide Covenant law into two aspects - Ceremonial Law and Moral Law - and they then propose that Christians are delivered from Ceremonial Law, but that they are still under Moral Law. Why? Because Jesus has fulfilled the Ceremonial law, but he has not come to abolish Moral law. On this basis they turn Christians once again to the written codes of law such as the Ten Commandments, so as to encourage them to keep the Sabbath, or to tithe, or such like. 

But that is not what Paul is saying. Nowhere does Paul make that kind of distinction concerning Covenant law, and he certainly does not do so here in his letter to the Romans. Neither was it customary for Jews – to whom Sinai Covenant law was given – to understand Covenant law in this way. They saw Covenant law as a whole, as a unified entity, an integrated system. So I dismiss this legalist proposal.

Paul does not direct Christians to Covenant law but instead, as we see in verse 3, he does the opposite. He points out the weakness of Covenant law and directs Christians to the Messiah instead. Why? Because Christians retain their flesh with its inherent principle of self-forfeiture, but Jesus decisively judges down against loss and self-forfeiture within our flesh, by condemning it within the likeness of sinful flesh as God’s sacrificial Lamb without spot or blemish. Self-forfeiture and loss is effectively condemned and sent away for those entrusting the Messiah by means of the Messiah’s acceptable substitutionary atoning sacrifice as the spotless Lamb of God. Jesus paid the purchase price required to buy back those whom God has selected – that price being the spilt life-blood and physical death of the Messiah within the likeness of sinful flesh. 

Why is self-forfeiture and loss condemned and paid for by the Messiah on behalf of those brought forth by God? Paul tells us in verse 4 – ‘in order that the judicial approval of the Law is being made full and complete within us’. For Christians, the judicial approval of the law is now being made full and complete – not by Christians trying to observe external written codes, but the law is being made full and complete within them. How is this happening? What is the fundamental principle or dynamic process? He goes on to tell us. 

Self-forfeiture and loss is condemned by the Messiah in order that the judicial approval, the fundamental principle of the law – the enactment of law, the practical obedience which the law calls for, the goal of the law - is being made full and complete in us, or ‘realised in us’. He defines ‘us’ as ‘the not walking around down from the flesh, but down from breath’.  In other words, Christians who are conducting their daily lives within the movement and direction of the Breath of Life in the Messiah that is present in their deep inner core. 

The purpose of the law is being made full and complete in Christians who are walking around moment-by-moment within the unction of the set-apart Breath residing in their heart

The self-forfeiting impulses of the Christian’s flesh still remain active as the verses that follow distinctly show, but the opposing Breath within Christians has broken their tied enslavement to these impulses. In this way, Christians have been brought forth as a new orderly form, their old form or self has passed away, impaled on the execution post of the cross.

However, it does not follow that any Christians will actually completely avoid all wayward behaviour, nor that they are accepted on the basis of their own actions. This would contradict other Scripture texts (James 2 v 10; I John 1 v 8). Paul confessed that he was not already perfect or fully complete himself, (Philippians 3 v 12). But fullness and completion by means of the atoning sacrifice of the Messiah and the set-apart Breath dwelling within them, is presented as the goal and the means of those whom God has selected (Matthew 5 v 48). By actual practical, progressive growth and maturity Christians are to show that their union with the Messiah is real. The Breath within them gives a new dynamic, direction and tone to their character and their life, working in opposition to the impulses that still remain active within the fabric of their fleshly constitution.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [58] – Two fundamental principles

 ‘…Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time 2 because the fundamental principle of the Breath, [Pneuma], the Life within Jesus the Messiah, has set you free away from the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture, loss and the death. For the powerless incapable law, within which it is weak and feeble by means of the flesh, God, having sent His Son within resemblance of self-forfeiting flesh, and concerning self-forfeiture and loss, has condemned self-forfeiture and loss within the flesh’, (Romans 8 v 1 - 3).

Paul mentions two opposing fundamental dynamic principles of movement within Christians – 

Life within Jesus the Messiah

And

Self-forfeiture, loss, and the death

The principle, inclination and direction of movement towards self-forfeiture, loss and death is inherent within the fabric of our fleshly constitution and works in opposition to God. As a Christian, ‘I’ closely identify with delight in the honourable, praiseworthy law of God, but this principle within my fleshly constitution leads me to self-forfeiting behaviours that ‘I’ do not intend. 

But Christians are brought forth as part of the free gift of God by means of the Messiah and they possess the set-apart Breath that is moving on the basis of the fundamental principle of Life within the Messiah. The consequence is that ‘the Breath, [Pneuma], has set them free away from the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture, loss and the death’. Christians possess a direction of movement, a current, deep within their inner core that ‘outsiders’ or ‘unbelievers’ do not possess. 

How does this relate to the written codes of Covenant law? ‘For the powerless incapable law, within which it is weak and feeble by means of the flesh, God, having sent His Son within resemblance of self-forfeiting flesh, and concerning self-forfeiture and loss, has condemned self-forfeiture and loss within the flesh’, (Romans 8 v 3). Paul has been looking at the objections of those seeking divine approval by means of seeking to obey the injunctions of divine law since chapter 7 v 1. He has not forgotten that Covenant law has been an aspect of his discussion of divine approval, and he returns to divine law in verse 3, in the light of all that he has been saying, particularly since chapter 7.

 

So where does Paul direct Christians when it comes to perpetual Life with a capital ‘L’ - to sensitivity and responsiveness to God and His Messiah? Where do Christians look to obtain Life-energy that opposes the impetus of self-forfeiture, loss and death inherent in their flesh, in their day-to-day existence? ‘Aha!’ say Christian legalists. ‘We look to divine law! We look to the written codes of Mosaic Law – of Sinai Covenant Law, such as the Ten Commandments - to spur us on towards a clean, godly life.’ But that is not what Paul says here, or anywhere else. Given what he has been saying, Paul initially points Christians to the free gift of by means of Jesus the Messiah.

How is divine approval attained and maintained in daily life? How is self-forfeiture dealt with? Not by turning to try to walk in obedience to the written codes of divine law. Why don’t Christians turn to Covenant law if they agree with delight in divine law that is good, honourable and praiseworthy? Christians don’t turn to divine law because it is weak, feeble, powerless and incapable. The reason for this weakness of the law is the Christian’s earthy, sensuous, fleshly constitution with its inherent principle of self-forfeiture, loss and death that moves in opposition to God. 

Divine approval is attained like this - God loves the world in this way – He sent His only-begotten Son in the likeness of flesh, such that His Messiah condemns self-forfeiture and loss within the flesh. Paul does not direct Christians to divine law because our fleshly constitution makes the law weak and ineffective. Instead, he directs Christians to the good news of the free gift of God, Jesus the Messiah. Why? He will explain in the next verse.  

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [57] – No condemnation within Jesus [3]

 ‘What will deliver me from this death-body? Rejoice! The free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord! So then indeed, I am willingly serving God’s law with the mind, but [my] flesh, [is enslaved to] fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss. Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time 2 because the fundamental principle of the Breath, [Pneuma], the Life within Jesus the Messiah, has set you free away from the fundamental principle of the self-forfeiture, loss and the death’, (Romans 7 v 25 – 8 v 1, 2). 

This is how Paul is logically reasoning as we come to the beginning of chapter 8. He has been dealing with some anticipated objections to the way of divine approval since the beginning of chapter 6, especially in relation to the Christian’s freedom away from the written codes of divine Law. He is now beginning to bring together his conclusion about the wider theme of divine approval, especially in relation to Covenant law. He has introduced ‘the free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord’, and has made the general statement that ‘Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time’, (verse 1). 

Even though as a Christian ‘I am willingly serving God’s law with the mind, but [my] flesh [is enslaved to] fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss’, nevertheless, at this present moment, because of the ‘the free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord…Under these circumstances, [there is] no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time’. Note that Paul is not referring to something that will happen in the future. He is not saying that there will be no condemnation at some time in the future, at the Great Assizes. He is saying that there is no condemnation now, at this present time. 

Paul tells us why is there no condemnation in the next verse. ‘Because the fundamental principle of the Breath, [Pneuma], the Life within Jesus the Messiah, has set you free away from the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture, loss and the death’, (Romans 8 v 2). Paul returns to the theme of ‘breath’ that he mentioned earlier in Romans 7 v 14. This time the Greek word has a capital letter indicating the Breath of God set-apart from the world. In connection with set-apart Breath he also introduces the concept of ‘the fundamental principle of the Breath, [Pneuma], the Life within Jesus the Messiah’, which he places in opposition to ‘the fundamental principle of the self-forfeiture, loss and the death’. In this verse he also moves the focus away from himself and to the Hebrew Christians. Having explained the situation using himself as an illustration, he now applies the themes he has introduced to these Jewish Christians and says ‘Life within Jesus the Messiah, has set you free away from the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture’.

So what is Paul describing? He says that ‘under these circumstances’ of ‘the free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord’ there is no judicial condemnation within the Messiah at this present time because of a ‘fundamental principle’. Paul uses the word ‘nomos’, meaning ‘law’ and this is very often how the verse is translated – ‘the law of the Spirit of the life in Jesus’. This Greek word can refer to ‘the written codes of Covenant Law’, or to ‘law’ as a general principle, or to both simultaneously. The particular sense is determined by the context. 

Because Paul is referring to the set-apart Breath I propose that Paul intends the sense of a ‘fundamental principle’, a basic truth about the movement of set-apart Breath, an authoritative regulation and guide of the direction of movement of set-apart Breath. What is the fundamental principle of set-apart Breath? It is ‘Life within Jesus the Messiah’. This movement of set-apart Breath, the principle of ‘Life within Jesus the Messiah’ has ‘set you free’. By ‘you’ Paul means Christians, especially Hebrew Christians who ‘know the law’. What are Christians set free away from? They are set free away from the ‘fundamental principle of self-forfeiture, loss and the death’. Once again, by the word ‘law’ Paul means a ‘fundamental principle’. As Paul has said earlier, ‘the extended free gift of God [is] perpetual Life within our Lord Jesus, the Messiah’, (Romans 6 v 20 – 23). This principle of the set-apart Breath - Life within the Messiah - has set Christians free from ‘the fundamental principle of self-forfeiture and loss’ that is inherent within their fleshly constitution, and ‘the death’. As part of the free gift of God by means of the Messiah, Christians possess the set-apart Breath in their deep inner core. The current of set-apart Breath, moving on the principle of Life within the Messiah, has liberated Christians away from the fundamental principle of the self-forfeiture, loss and the death that is inherent in their flesh. 

This liberation has been completed in the past. But make no mistake – I am not saying that Christians are therefore perfectly free from fleshly impulses, or that their battle against their fleshly impulses is easy. Nor am I saying that Christians are free to do anything they want. 

Principles of living a godly life [56] – No condemnation within Jesus [2]

 Paul possessed a legal frame of mind. He constructed his arguments and conclusions carefully and logically, paying close attention to the meaning of words. Sometimes his reasoning is complex. For example, most of us compare and contrast two elements or facets of a problem but Paul has now introduced no less than six elements, all of which are interconnected in some way. 

These are the elements that he has introduced in this discussion -

1) His main theme from chapter 6 has been divine Law in relation to obtaining divine approval. His stance is that Christians are dying away from and set free from the written codes of Sinai Covenant law. Nevertheless, Christians closely identify with delight in good, clean and praiseworthy divine law. 

2) By means of Sinai Covenant law people come to know self-forfeiture and loss. But self-forfeiture uses the opportunity provided by divine law as a starting point to increase, such that we see that self-forfeiture is present in all of our thoughts, words, desires and so on. Thanks to the written codes of Covenant law we are no longer ignorant of self-forfeiture and loss. But we are deceived, because we thought that divine law led to life – ‘Do this and you will live’ - but instead it leads us to death. Knowing Covenant law leads to a greater knowledge and experiential awareness of the extent and magnitude of self-forfeiture, divine disapproval and loss, which we come to plainly see.

3) Divine law pertains to the realm of Breath - the unseen current and energy away from God, the Messiah and the heavenly realm. 

4) Christians exist as flesh, which has inherent energies, impulses and inclinations that are opposed to Breath. 

This places Christians in a battle -

Fleshly energies work to bring divinely disapproved-of speech and behaviour to completion. 

On being brought forth by God, ‘I’ [ego] am not intending to engage in such disapproved-of behaviour. But fleshly impulses take me captive.

5) How can I be delivered away from my flesh? By the free gift of God by means of Jesus the Messiah, our Lord.

6) Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time.

If the Apostle had been a juggler, he wouldn’t have been throwing two or three balls in the air, but these six. No wonder Romans chapter 7 proves to be a difficult chapter to interpret and understand correctly. At the start of chapter 8, Paul is continuing with his discussion of the means of divine approval – ‘Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation at this present time’

Principles of living a godly life [55] – No condemnation within Jesus [1]

 ‘Rejoice! The free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord! So then, indeed I am willingly serving God’s law with the mind, but [my] flesh, [is enslaved to] fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss. Under these circumstances, no judicial condemnation within Jesus the Messiah at this present time’, (Romans 7 v 25, 8 v 1).

Paul continues his discussion about judicial approval and deliverance in verse 1 of chapter 8. Very often the start of this verse is translated in to English like this – ‘Therefore there is now no condemnation…’. But there is nothing in the immediately previous verses at the end of chapter 7 to directly suggest that Paul has successfully argued such a conclusion. Chapter 7 actually ends with the strongest assertion of the sin-awaking and sin-detecting power of divine Law and the consequent conflict within the Christian. ‘So then, indeed I am willingly serving God’s law with the mind, but flesh [is enslaved to] fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss’, (Romans 7 v 25).

Thus it is better to refer the introduction of chapter 8 to the whole of Paul’s previous logical reasoning. Verse 1 is especially connected with chapters 5 and 6, and the first section of chapter 7, which state, (using various means of imagery), the union of those brought forth by God with the Messiah by means of the set-apart Breath. So far in his letter to the Romans the Apostle has discussed and explained, from many sides, the central theme of salvation, divine approval and its immediate results. These aspects include union with the Messiah, bond-service to God, enlightened liberation of the will, and so on. His last theme has been the place of the written codes of divine Law. With regard to both unbelievers and Christians, divine Law cannot subdue self-forfeiture, but only expose and condemn it. Paul has answered various anticipated objections, partly to vindicate the set-apart cleanliness and praiseworthiness of the Law, partly to expose the magnitude of self-forfeiture, and partly to reinforce the truth that divine approval has to be attained by another way. 

But it is even better to consider the opening words of verse 1 to be the start of a new aspect in the light if all that Paul has been saying. Understanding the Greek word ‘ara’ is the key here. The meaning of the word is more nuanced than the English word ‘therefore’. Thayer states it like this, ‘under these circumstances, something either is so, or becomes so’. It refers to a preceding assertion or fact, (verse 25), or even to something existing only in the mind, and leads to something that follows on as a consequence. With verse 1 we have another example of the later superimposition of chapter and verse divisions on the text potentially getting in the way. Paul is continuing to logically progress from what he has been saying previously. And he has by no means finished talking about divine law, which he will return to in verses 4 and 7 of chapter 8 as part of his continuing discussion about Christians and maintaining divine approval day-by-day.  

I also want to note that the rest of the verse 1 says, [Not walking down from flesh, but down from breath] [pneuma], (Romans 8 v 1b). It is highly probable that these words are to be removed or omitted since it is very likely that copyists inserted them here. We will come across these words a little later, in their correct place, as Paul continues his reasoning and analysis. But when placed here, they intrude and distract from the sequence of Paul’s logical propositions. 

Principles of living a godly life [54] – Deliverance through the free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah

 ‘Rejoice! The free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord! So then, indeed I am willingly serving God’s law with the mind, but flesh, fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss’, (Romans 7 v 25).

Paul has led us to a point of helplessness, even despair, concerning our inability to set ourselves free from, or to overcome the inherent impulses within our fleshly constitution. By means of God’s law we know that God disapproves of certain behaviours – but in knowing God’s Law we begin to perceive our self-forfeiture in every aspect of our being. As we are by nature, our fleshly impulses lead us to self-forfeiture and loss – to divine disapproval and judicial condemnation. Even as Christians who are persuaded of the good news of the Messiah and desiring to live a godly life day-by-day, the intentions that arise within our enlightened mind are being frustrated and opposed by these impulses and energies within our physical flesh. Paul asks, ‘What will rescue and deliver me from out of this, the death body?’

Then, suddenly, Paul talks about rejoicing and giving thanks. Why? Because the answer to his question is, ‘the free kindness and favour of God by means of Jesus the Messiah our Lord!’ We get a sense I think that he cannot contain himself any longer. He thanks God for effecting a deliverance that is beyond his own ability. There is a way of divine approval and Paul places it completely in God’s free favour by means of the Lord Jesus, Messiah. What divine Law cannot do, and what our human constitution cannot do, is being accomplished by means of the Messiah as a result of God’s free favour. 

Paul then succinctly restates what he said earlier in verses 20 – 23. ‘So then’. He sums up the position that he has arrived at thus far. He returns to the polarising dichotomy between his godly intentions as a result of his enlightened mind, and the opposing impulses of his fleshly constitution. This is where he is as a Christian at this present time. On the one hand, ‘I [‘ego’ as governor/controller/regulator] am indeed willingly serving God’s law with the mind’, in my ‘inner man’ or the ‘inside of the cup’. I am agreeing alongside good, clean, praiseworthy divine law and my intention is to honour and praise God in my speech and behaviour. But my ‘flesh [my death-body], is serving fundamental principles of self-forfeiture and loss’. So I sometimes fail to do what ‘I’ [ego/governor/regulator] intend. Because impulses inherent in my fleshly constitution working in opposition to God, are taking me captive and working themselves out from within, They are carrying across into self-forfeiting speech and behaviour that Covenant law condemns and God disapproves of.

Paul maintains the important concept of separation between ‘ego’ – ‘I’ as inner controller/governor/regulator – and the raw energies inherent within his fleshly constitution. He established this position in Romans 7 v 17 - 23. He says, as a Christian, ‘I’ [ego] am not deliberately originating these raw impulses in my flesh from out of nothing by using my mind. Nor am I closely identifying with them. Rather, these impulses and inclinations are inherent within my earthy, sensuous, fleshly constitution, within the fabric of my flesh. Therefore, as a Christian, when I see myself behaving and speaking in ways that God disapproves of, ‘I’ [ego] am not fully, completely and wholeheartedly co-operating with bringing these impulses to fruition. They have taken me captive within self-forfeiture and loss and ‘I’ am grieved by such behaviour. 

Principles of living a godly life [53] – Christians and deliverance

 ‘I am a wretched, afflicted man! What will rescue and deliver me from out of this, the death-body?’ (Romans 7 v 24).

As Paul has reasoned through and analysed the process that leads him as a Christian to speak and behave in ways that God disapproves of, and the situation seems to be depressing and hopeless. And that is indeed the sub-conclusion that Paul reaches in this verse. Paul refers to his physical body as ‘the death-body’ or as it is in some translations, ‘body of death’. Even now, as a Christian, he does not simply desire to speak and act in a particular way and it then happens without fail. As a Christian he does not merely intend to avoid a certain manner of speech or a particular behaviour and then it simply happens as he chooses. This contrariness is certainly my experience as a Christian and I am sure that it is your experience too. What is causing this problem? It is not divine law itself that is at fault, but his physical, fleshly body - his human constitution inherited from his ancestors. His physical flesh possesses raw passions, desires, impulses, energies and inclinations – in short, an impetus that seeks to work itself out to completion by carrying across to the other side from within so as to be manifest in his speech and behaviour. These energies within our fleshly constitution are working in opposition to God such that they lead us away from life. If we follow these impulses and inclinations, they produce increasing levels of blindness and ignorance with regard to spiritual realities, and a hardness or callousness deep within us with regard to spiritual realities, and this in turn leads to further wayward speech and behaviour. These energies, inherent within the fabric of our flesh, lead us to ignorance, insensitivity and unresponsiveness to God – to withering away, dying away and death – hence Paul calls it our ‘death body’. Paul has outlined this process for both Gentiles and Jews in Romans 1 v 18 – 3 v 20 and thus he says, ‘I am a wretched, afflicted man!’. Even as a Christian, enlightened and illuminated with regard to God, the Messiah and the gospel, and closely identifying with delight in the Law of God down from the man within, he still does not manage to live a life of perfect godliness. This is because the contrary impulses within the fabric of his physical flesh take him captive.

This gives rise to Paul’s rhetorical question – ‘What will rescue and deliver me from out of this, the death body?’  Who is able to leave their body in order to be free from these raw passions and impulses so as to serve God in perfect purity? The answer is self-evident, no one has such ability and power. But that is not quite the question that Paul asks. He is no longer looking to himself and his own ability to observe divine law, because he has shown how weak and lacking in ability he is. Instead he looks outside of himself. In effect he asks, ‘Is there anything ‘out there’ that will rescue me from out of my physical constitution, my death-body?’ Every translation reads, ‘Who will rescue me?’ The Greek word can mean ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘which, or ‘why’ – but the word ‘what’ fits better with the next verse than ‘who’. What can deliver Paul? ‘The free kindness and favour of God’, (verse 25a).

Principles of living a godly life [52] – Christians and divine law [5]

 Let’s stand back for a moment to summarise what Paul is saying and to look at the implications for seeking divine approval by means of divine law. 

Paul is saying that –

 

Divine Law is good, clean, honourable and praiseworthy

By means of divine law we gain knowledge of –

No share of divine inheritance, 

Self-forfeiture, and

Divine disapproval

But a polarising distinction exists –

Divine law is related to the realm of breath and the heavenly realm, 

Whereas we exist as a physical, fleshly entity

Before God brings us forth we follow or bring to completion our fleshly impulses

Self-forfeiture takes hold of divine law and the knowledge it presents

Self-forfeiture uses the law as a starting point to increase and become apparent in every aspect and facet

After God has brought us forth as Christians we find two opposing fundamental principles within us –

 

Our illuminated mind agrees that divine law is good, clean, honourable and praiseworthy

‘I’ closely identify with delight in God’s Law with my mind

Our intention is to speak and behave in agreement with it

But

An opposing energy, impetus and movement exists within our flesh

This impetus, existing in my members, takes me captive within self-forfeiture and loss

The result is that

I speak and behave in ways that ‘I’ do not intend

I say and do the very things that ‘I’ despise

This means that

‘I’ as governor/controller am not fully and wholeheartedly doing this, 

Rather, 

It is the energy and impetus of self-forfeiture inherent within my fleshly constitution that produces the behaviour that ‘I’ do not intend

This means that IF I as a Christian turn to seeking to obey divine law in order to promote my divine approval moment-by-moment, THEN I gain knowledge and confirmation of my self-forfeiture, loss and divine disapproval. My knowledge of self-forfeiture spreads into every aspect - into my behaviour, thoughts, passions and intentions - so that my self-forfeiture increases and is clearly seen. ‘Because Law is working down settled anger’, (Romans 4 v 15a).

But Paul has not finished his explanation and reasoning yet, so before I say any more I will continue to look at what he has to say next.

Principles of living a godly life [51] – Close identification with delight in the law

 ‘I closely identify with delight in the Law of God down from the man within; 23 but I perceive another law or principle within my members, waging war against the principle of my mind and taking me captive within the principle of self-forfeiture and loss existing within my members’, (Romans 7 v 22, 23). 

The Apostle Paul introduces another fundamental and vital concept, that of ‘close identification’. He uses the Greek word ‘synédomai’, from ‘sýn’, meaning ‘to closely identify with’ and ‘hēdomai’, ‘to experience delight’, hence the meaning ‘to closely identify with delight’. It occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. He closely identifies with delight ‘in the Law of God’ down from the ‘man within’ or ‘inner man’. He is referring to the ‘inside of the cup’ of the renewed man, the man brought forth by God. The general sense of the whole passage here in Romans 7 leads us to understand that Paul is referring to the rational aspect of Christians, the principle of the Christian’s enlightened mind, (verse 23), which is in opposition to the earthy, sensuous impulses of their fleshly constitution. 

Paul is talking about Christians here. Bible commentator John Gill is correct when he draws out the polarising difference between Christians and unbelievers. He says of this identification with delight in Gods Law down from the man within that ‘an unregenerate man cannot [closely identify with this delight in the Law]. He does not like its commands, they are disagreeable to his corrupt nature, and as it is a threatening, cursing, damning law it can never be delighted in by him. The moralist, the Pharisee, who obeys it externally, does not love it, nor delight in it. He obeys it not from [out of] love to its precepts, but from fear of its threats. Or from a desire for popular esteem, and low, mercenary, selfish views, in order to gain the applause of men, and favour of God. Only a regenerate man delights in the law of God, which he does as Christ fulfils it, who has answered all the demands of it’. (Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible, with slight paraphrasing of his comments on this verse).

But in verse 23, Paul describes the other process or principle that is at work within him, within his flesh, existing within his members, that he does not closely identify with and that is ‘taking him captive’. The Greek word means ‘taken by the spear’, like a prisoner of war, captured within the principle of self-forfeiture and loss. Hence his earlier statement in verse 20, ‘I [ego] am no longer fully working it out to completion, but on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’. He is being taken captive under duress. It is not his intention to be taken captive. It is happening but this does not mean that he is fully compliant, or happily willing to work for the enemy. In World War 2, if the Nazis captured someone, it did not mean that their captive suddenly became a Nazi – they did not suddenly identify with Nazism. That is a fairly clear illustration or image of Paul’s situation.   

‘I’ [ego] as governor/regulator/controller, stand as an intermediary between the impulses that are inherent and at work within my fleshly constitution, and what is carried across into my speech and behaviour. In other words, as a Christian ‘I’ [ego] act as an enlightened ‘regulator’ of what I allow to carry across from within. But imagine the attention of a guard at the guard post, or even the guard himself, being captured or waylaid for a moment. The guard post is then insufficiently unregulated and undesirable material gets carried across to the other side. The Apostle is not giving us freedom to say ‘It wasn’t me!’ or ‘Look what you made me do!’, which in effect is an attempt to say ‘I am not responsible’. No, the injunction of the Apostles is to maturity of understanding and to constant, vigilant watchfulness.

Principles of living a godly life [50] – Christians, ego and divine law [4]

 ‘Now if I [ego] construct this, that I am not intending, I [ego] am no longer fully working it out to completion, but on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me. 21 Therefore I am finding the law or principle that my intention is to manufacture and construct the good, [but] that inner malice and harm is at hand, present with me. 22 Because I closely identify with delight in the Law of God down from the man within; 23 but I perceive another law or principle within my members, waging war against the principle of my mind and taking me captive within the principle of self-forfeiture and loss existing within my members’, (Romans 7 v 20 - 23). 

In verse 20 Paul restates what he said in verse 14, and in the light of what he has said in the intervening verses, he now states it as a sub-conclusion. Self-forfeiture is creating energy, impetus, inclination and movement within his fleshly constitution, within the members of his physical body. This impetus brings to completion speech and behaviour that is not his intention, or even speech and behaviour that he despises. In other words, he is not always completely successful in exercising enlightened self-control and bringing his godly intentions to completion. 

So what is the process and situation that he is describing and how does it relate to good and praiseworthy divine law, and to divine approval moment-by-moment? In verse 21 Paul says that he finds a fundamental principle or process. He says - 

I am desiring and intending to do good in the inner man

Foulness and malice is dwelling within me, in my fleshly constitution

This leads him to a sub conclusion in verse 21. ‘Therefore I am finding the law or principle that my intention is to manufacture and construct the good, [but] that inner malice and harm is at hand, present with me’.  

He then explains this a little more. ‘Because I am closely identifying with delighting in the Law of God down from the man within’. Paul reaffirms not only that the Law down from God is good, but that he is closely identifying with it, agreeing with it and delighting in it. He says that this is coming down from the ‘man within’ as a Christian. In other words he is talking about the intangible realm within him – the ‘inside of the cup’ – and he confirms this in the next phrase, where he refers to his mind. 

This next phrase, (verse 23), is complex, so I will break it down into its parts. He also perceives another fundamental principle or process taking place within him. But this other principle is not taking place within his mind, but rather within the limbs and organs of his body – within the fabric of his fleshly constitution. This fundamental principle of energy, impulse, inclination, impetus and drive within his physical flesh is working in opposition to the first principle that is at work in his mind – in his ‘inner man’. These two fundamental principles within him are in opposition to one another. 

The result is that the impetus within his fleshly constitution is sometimes taking him captive. At this present time, as a Christian, Paul exists in his physical constitution and he is not able to fully, totally and completely live a perfectly clean, godly life day-by-day, because the principle or impetus existing within his fleshly constitution is sometimes taking him captive within self-forfeiture and loss.

Principles of living a godly life [49] – Christians, ego and divine law [3]

 ‘Now at this present time I am no longer fully working out to completion [what I do not intend, or what I hate], on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting dwelling within me. 18 For I know and am appreciating that absolutely no good is inhabiting within me, existing within this, my flesh, because intending and desiring is lying down side-by-side with me, but working out the good to completion, absolutely not. 19 For I am not manufacturing and constructing good that I am intending, on the contrary, the inner malice and harm that I am not intending, this I am accomplishing’, (Romans 7 v 17 - 19). 

Having made his general statement in verse 17, (see the previous post), he now goes on to explain what he means in more detail. From verse 14 Paul has been writing in the present tense and referring to himself as an illustrative example. He is talking to Christians who know law (verse 1), about himself as he is now, as a Christian. He is no longer talking about how things were before he became a Christian. Now ‘I’ [ego] am no longer fully working out to completion what ‘I’ [ego] do not intend. But neither am I perfect and complete. 

In verse 17 he says that self-forfeiture is creating an opposing energy, impetus, inclination and movement within him that brings to completion speech and behaviour that he does not desire, that he even despises. When he uses the phrase ‘within him’ he tells us in verse 18 what he means – he is referring to his flesh - his natural, earthy, fleshly, constitution. He has already pointed out that there is a polarising dichotomy between divine law that pertains to breath in the heavenly realm, and his fleshly [constitution] having been sold across the other side under no share and self-forfeiture’, (verse 14). Thus we find that in Paul’s mind, enlightened by the Breath, he knows, appreciates and agrees with good, clean, honourable and praiseworthy divine law, but at the same time, ‘absolutely no good is inhabiting’ his fleshly constitution. Right there he states the crux, the locus, of the conflict, contradiction and inconsistency within him at this present time, as a Christian.  

What is the evidence for this situation? How does Paul know that this is indeed the case? He knows ‘because intending and desiring is lying down side-by-side with me’ – the intention and desire towards godliness and divine approval moment-by-moment is settled close beside him – ‘but working out the good to completion, absolutely not’, (verse 18b). There is a problem in the process between his good intention and the working out of his good intention by carrying it across to the other side into his speech and behaviour. Paul says that he can see that this is the case because ‘I am not manufacturing and constructing good that I am intending’, (verse 19a). In fact, worse than this, the opposite is sometimes happening – ‘I am accomplishing the inner malice and harm that I am not intending’, (verse 19b). This is Paul, an Apostle, describing the dynamic process within himself at this present time as a Christian. 

I don’t know if this is true of your own experience as a Christian, but it is certainly true of my own experience. I agree with the honour and praiseworthiness of divine law, but with the best intention and desire in the world, I still by no means attain complete and total enlightened self-control. I don’t always end up doing or saying what I intend. I do sometimes find myself doing and saying things that I hate. I find a battle, a conflict, taking place within me, and if I were to say that I am living a perfectly godly life day-by-day, maintaining divine approval by means of my speech and behaviour as a Christian, then I am deceiving myself and fooling no one. 

Principles of living a godly life [48] – Christians, ego and divine law [2]

 ‘And if I am doing this, what I do not intend, I am agreeing and consenting in company with the law that is good and honourable. 17 Now at this present time I am no longer fully working it out to completion, on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’, (Romans 7 v 16, 17).

Paul is drawing out two important principles with regard to the fact that he sometimes behaves in ways that he does not intend or desire, or even in ways that he detests. The first principle is that his behaviour that is contrary to divine law does not mean that he is opposed to divine law. Rather, he agrees in company with divine law that is related to the Breath of God. He agrees that divine law is good, clean, honourable and praiseworthy. 

Then, here in verse 17, he moves on to the second principle with regard to the inconsistency of his behaviour with divine law and his own intentions. He makes the general statement that ‘at this present time I [ego] am no longer fully working it out to completion, on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’. We now reach the crux of the dynamic process that is happening within him and leading him to this contrary behaviour. He says, ‘I am no longer working it out to completion’. He uses a Greek word that in recent decades has fallen into common use – ‘ego’ – ‘I’. He is now looking at what Jesus called ‘the inside of the cup’, the inner, less tangible realm of mind, emotions, desires, intentions and so on. The different facets and aspects within our inner realm – our thoughts, feelings, preferences and so on – emerge into a form of hierarchy in which these various inner aspects become co-ordinated and interconnected. Thus, at or near the top of this inner hierarchy is our co-ordinated sense and locus of ‘I’-ness, our locus of control, regulation or governance. To varying degrees, ‘I’ or ‘ego’ as controller/governor, co-ordinate, evaluate, order and govern the various aspects within – my thoughts, memories, desires, emotions, conscience, attention and so on. ‘I’ do this with the aim of choosing how to act, to do this, not that. 

Paul says that at this present time, now that I am a Christian, ‘I’ as governor/controller am no longer fully working out self-forfeiture and loss to the end result of its completion in speech and behaviour. That’s what I did before God brought me forth. But now, at this present time, ‘I’ am no longer fully carrying across self-forfeiture and loss from within so as to bring it to completion in my speech and behaviour. Nevertheless, I do find that I am speaking and behaving in ways that ‘I’ do not intend. In other words he is saying that ‘I’ [ego/governor/controller] am not fully in control over the energies of self-forfeiture within my fleshly constitution. ‘I’ am failing in my self-governance sometimes. The evidence of this failure is that I sometimes speak and behave in ways that ‘I’ [ego/governor/controller] do not intend. In fact I sometimes speak and behave in ways that ‘I’ [ego/governor/controller] despise and hate. 

So this begs the question, ‘If ‘I’ am not always totally in control, if my speech and behaviour is not always completely what ‘I’ intend, then what is it that is bringing such unintended and undesired speech and behaviour to completion?’ Paul answers straight away. It is ‘the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’. In other words, within the Apostle there is an energy, impetus, inclination or ‘drive’ that sometimes defeats his intentions and considered desires, and overcomes his self-control. 

‘Look what you made me do!’ ‘Don’t blame me! He/she/they/it made me do it!’. That is the unspoken objection to what Paul is saying. The objection is that Paul is saying that we are not accountable for our self-forfeiting speech and behaviour. Indeed, within civil law in the U.K. we have the category and defence plea of ‘diminished responsibility’. When someone behaves or speaks in an unacceptable or illegal way, their responsibility and accountability for what they do and say might be considered to be diminished. If it can be shown for example that they were physically ill at the time of their offending behaviour, such as suffering from a brain tumour that affected and distorted their perception of objective reality, then this would be taken into consideration. Although Paul does not directly address such a potential objection here, it is clear from the verses that follow, as well as his other writings, that he is not proposing such an idea. So with that in mind I will stay with what he has to say here as he goes on to explain what he means. (See further discussion on this theme when I look at Romans 7 v 20 - 25).

Principles of living a godly life [47] – Christians and divine law [1]

 ‘For indeed, I am not knowing or understanding what I am working out and producing. For what I am not intending and desiring, this I am doing, and what I am detesting and hating, this I am manufacturing and constructing. And if I am doing this, what I do not intend, I am agreeing and consenting in company with the law that is good and honourable. 17 Now at this present time, not like before, I [ego] am no longer fully working it out to completion, on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’, (Romans 7 v 15 - 17). 

Paul continues to present himself as an illustration of his teaching. He is now talking in the present tense, having in the past been sold across the other side under the power of self-forfeiture and loss. He was carried across to divine condemnation, but divine law itself did not cause this, nor is divine law inherently bad. The cause of his selling across is the fact that he exists as a fleshly entity, and the result at this present time, as a Christian, is that he does not know or understand his behaviour. There is a fundamental contrariness and conflict within the very fabric of his being. There are certain behaviours and actions that he does not intend or desire to engage in, yet he finds that he nevertheless engages in these very behaviours. There are certain behaviours and actions that he hates and detests yet these are the very things that he sometimes finds himself constructing. 

So how does this situation relate to good, clean, divine law? He tells us in the next two verses. ‘And if I am doing this, what I do not intend, I am agreeing and consenting in company with the law that is good and honourable. 17 Now at this present time, not like before, I [ego] am no longer fully working it out to completion, on the contrary, the self-forfeiture sitting and dwelling within me’, (verses 16, 17).

There are two important principles that emerge from out of this inner conflict and contrariness. He states the first in verse 16. He finds himself doing something – behaving, speaking, thinking – that he does not intend or desire, that he even hates and despises. So the first principle is this - IF he does not intend or desire such behaviour THEN this means that he agrees in company with the good and praiseworthy divine law. IF he does not intend or desire such behaviour, THEN he is not constructing this behaviour from out of considering divine law to be bad or dishonourable. He is not dismissing divine law, or opposing divine law.  

The first principle in relation to divine law is this -

IF we are engaging in speech and behaviour that we do not intend or desire, or that we despise,

THEN we are in agreement in company with good, honourable and praiseworthy divine law

Let’s imagine that I impulsively and opportunistically steal something, even though I do not usually desire to steal, and usually consider stealing to be a transgression of divine law and therefore disapproved-of by God. In stealing I have acted contrary to myself and done something that I disapprove of, that in a more sober moment I did not intend. I am not only acting contrary to myself but also contrary to divine law, which I agree with - stealing is wrong. The first point that Paul is making is that because in my calm and sober moments I do not intend to steal, that I even despise stealing, then in this instance of my stealing, it does not mean that I therefore disagree with or oppose divine law. Rather my behaviour is inconsistent with my usual intentions and with the divine law that I agree with. 

Principles of living a godly life [46] – Divine Law [31] – Flesh, Breath and divine law

 ‘Because we know that law exists related to Breath pertaining to God [pneuma]. But I am fleshly, having been sold across the other side under self-forfeiture and loss’, (Romans 7 v 14).  

Paul continues his explanation of why good divine law does not cause his no share and self-forfeiture. In this verse he changes from the past tense that he has been using since verse 7, and begins to use the present tense. In the previous verses Paul used the past tense in talking about himself, referring to himself before he was a Christian. But he now begins to describe himself at the time of writing. He goes a step deeper to look at some fundamental principles and in doing so he turns to two important and pivotal themes - the polarising difference between Christians and unbelievers, and the opposition between Breath and flesh. These themes run through all of his thinking. He mentions the importance of Breath in the first two chapters of his first letter to the Corinthians, as well as in his letter to the Galatians, and he brings into focus once again here.

He is speaking to Jewish Christians who know divine law, (Romans 7 v 1), and he begins with a view that both he and they share in common – ‘we know that law exists related to Breath pertaining to God’. Divine law is related to Breath, a current or movement that pertains to God and the unseen realm. In other words divine law is not of human origin. It is not merely a moral, ethical or philosophical tradition constructed by scholars in the past and that has then been handed down from generation to generation. Law is of divine origin, it exists in relation to Breath pertaining to God, and the implications of this are that God approves of divine law and that the law is clean and pure. It is virtuous, set apart from the standards, principles and values of the worldly arrangement, and therefore it is good, reflecting life and sensitivity to God, and what God desires and approves of. This divine origin by means of Breath is a fundamental principle that underpins divine law.

Paul then places the Breath pertaining to God and the unseen realm in polarising contrast and opposition to flesh – ‘But I am fleshly’. It is a fundamental principle that I exist consisting of flesh, says Paul. He now begins to use the present tense and he says in effect, ‘I do not exist as breath – I exist as a physical, fleshly being. Although at this present time he is a Christian, this does not mean that he no longer has a physical, fleshly constitution. 

So what is the implication of being fleshly? He tells us right away, ‘having been sold across the other side under no share and self-forfeiture’. The phrase ‘having been sold’ is a ‘perfect participle’ - a form of verb used to indicate an action that was completed before another action began. The action that was fully completed before he became a Christian, and that occurred because of his fleshly constitution, was that he had been carried across to the other side, ‘sold’ under self-forfeiture and loss. What we have seen him describing in the previous verses is his emergent knowledge by means of good, virtuous divine law, was that his self-forfeiture and loss was super-abundant. 

The Greek word translated into English as ‘sold’ is the verb ‘pipraskó’, which primarily means ‘to sell’ or ‘to be sold’, ‘across the other side’. When something is ‘sold’ it passes from one side to the other. It describes the literal act of selling goods or property, as well as being used in a metaphorical sense to describe being carried across under the power or influence of self-forfeiture and loss, reflecting the pervasive nature of this process. Thus, Paul was carried across the other side – penetrating to divine disapproval - as a slave under the rule of self-forfeiture and loss. The emphasis is not on the word ‘sold’ as if any usual act of selling and purchase had taken place, but rather on the effect - he had been carried across under the influence of self-forfeiture. The Greek preposition ‘ὑπο’́ - means ‘underneath’ - with the accusative, implying direction - so as to be ‘under the power of’ self-forfeiture and loss. That is the fundamental principle that underpins what it means to exist as ‘fleshly’ or ‘down from the flesh’. 

Principles of living a godly life [45] – Self-forfeiture, loss and divine law [2]

 ‘Then the good became my death? It cannot come to be! But self-forfeiture and loss, in order to be shown self-forfeiture and loss, is fully working out my death by means of the good, in order that self-forfeiture and loss comes down self-forfeiture and loss beyond measure, by means of the injunction’, (Romans 7 v 13).

Earlier in his letter to the Romans, Paul said, ‘Law is working down settled anger’, (Romans 4 v 15a). He is explaining that statement here. He anticipates a final objection, namely that good, divinely approved law causes his death. Once again he phrases the objection in the form of a rhetorical question – ‘Does good law become my death?’ Does the cause of my death, my condemnation and loss, lie with good, divine law itself? Is divine law the cause of my death, my withering away? Once again he dismisses such a suggestion – such a thing cannot come to happen. 

He then describes the dynamic process once again. It is a slightly complex verse but lets go through it bit by bit. The core of his reply to this objection is that his self-forfeiture and loss already existed, but he did not know it until law came along. Before divine law came along he existed in relative ignorance and considered himself free to behave as he pleased. By means of the injunctions of divine law, Paul came to know self-forfeiture and loss existing within him and he began to realise that he was enslaved to it. In order to be seen to be self-forfeiture and loss, self-forfeiture took hold of the initial starting-point provided by divine law. Self-forfeiture roused up to life and by means of good divine law, it fully worked out towards his death. Every facet, aspect and form of self-forfeiture and loss roused up within him, (verse 8a), with regard to this or that particular injunction. He became aware that he was self-forfeiting in his words, in his behaviours, in his thoughts, in his intentions and in his desires and inclinations, such that his self-forfeiture and loss, and his awareness of it, increased. He came to know more and more aspects and facets of, and the greater extent of, his self-forfeiture. By means of good divine law ‘coming in’, self-forfeiture and loss came down beyond measure – there were too many instances of it to count - and as such it was clearly seen to be self-forfeiture and loss. In the light of divine law there was no doubt that self-forfeiture and loss existed, in abundance. But divine law itself did not cause his self-forfeiture. Rather, divine law revealed the extent and degree of his self-forfeiture, such that it was clearly seen to be self-forfeiture. 

Principles of living a godly life [44] – Self-forfeiture, loss and divine law [1]

 ‘Because self-forfeiture and loss, having taken hold of a starting point by means of the injunction, thoroughly deceived me and by means of it, slew me. 12 So that therefore law is indeed set apart, and the injunction set apart, righteous and intrinsically good’ (Romans 7 v 11, 12).

If we are in any doubt as to what Paul has been saying in the previous verses, he restates what he said in verse 8 so that we are clear what happens to us as ‘unbelievers’ existing within the realm of the flesh. Paul says, ‘I encountered knowledge gained by means of divine law and I initially thought it was a means to gain and maintain divine approval – ‘Do this and I will live’. But instead, self-forfeiture and loss took hold of an initial starting point presented by means of the injunction or commandment. 

Here is the principle or the fundamental process –

Knowledge of divine law raises our self-forfeiture and loss to life, which then begins to take hold within us

By means of the knowledge that he gained from divine law, self-forfeiture and loss thoroughly deceived Paul. He initially supposed that he was going onward to life and that divine law would lead him to life, to divine approval. But self-forfeiture and loss roused up by means of knowing the law, deceived him and slew him. Knowledge of his self-forfeiture put him to dying away and death. By means of the law he found that his self-forfeiture and loss was much greater and more extensive than he initially thought when he first encountered the injunction. 

So this is Paul’s reply to the objection that he stated in verse 7 – ‘Shall we say ‘The law of self-forfeiture and loss?’ Is it divine law itself that creates self-forfeiture and loss within us? On the contrary, divine law itself is good, clean and set apart, and God judicially approves the injunction.

When Christian legalists are faced with those Christians who say that they are freed away from law through the Messiah, they sometimes make out as though such Christians are saying that divine law is ‘bad’, or that the law itself creates self-forfeiture and loss. In reply they then firmly insist that divine law is good and right, and that it promotes cleanliness and godliness, and that David loved divine law, (Psalm 119 v 97, 113, 163, 165). They imply or even say directly that if you do not love divine law and look to it as a means to promote a godly life then there is something wrong with you as a Christian. They question your loyalty to God or even whether you really do believe after all.   

Nevertheless, despite these protests by Christian (or Jewish) legalists, Paul says in verse 6, ‘But now we [Hebrew Christians] are rendered entirely idle away from the law’. He agrees with legalists that divine law is good and judicially approved. But he also says that by means of divine law, self-forfeiture and loss is roused up and is revealed to reach every part and facet of our being. Divine law is not leading to life and holiness, but to withering away and death – to divine condemnation.

I point out once again that at the moment Paul is still looking at those who know law but who are walking around day-by-day down from their flesh, down from the inclinations of their long established physical constitution. He is looking at those who are not entrusting God and His Messiah. 

However, he has one more anticipated objection in mind before he turns his attention to Christians.

Principles of living a godly life [43] – Human nature and divine law [3]

 ‘For separate and apart from law, self-forfeiture and loss is lifeless, 9 and how much I [ego] was living separate and apart from law. But the injunction having come, the self-forfeiture and loss came up to life, and I [ego] withered away. 10 I discovered the injunction penetrating towards life - this penetrated towards death’, (Romans 7 v 8b - 10).

Imagine getting your first motorcycle or car, and having passed your driving test, you go out to enjoy driving for its own sake. It doesn’t matter where you go – it’s the freedom of movement that you now have and the sheer enjoyment of driving. After a while you find yourself in a small town that you have never been to before and it feels wonderful to have the freedom to explore this new location. But as you are driving, someone points out that you are driving in the wrong direction down a one-way street – you are breaking the law. Whilst you were unaware of breaking a law you were free and enjoying yourself. You had no awareness that you were breaking the law, or of any fines or penalties that you might be incurring, or the potential danger you were in. But then someone pointed out that you were breaking the law – a rule of law ‘came in’. As a result, the incurring of all kinds of fines and penalties ‘sprung to life’ in your mind. That is the kind of initial process that Paul describes in relation to divine law in verses 8b and 9. 

The result of knowing divine law is that our sense of freedom, moral rightness and ability begins to wither away. Our former persuasion of being alive vanishes, because by means of knowing the law we see that we have incurred loss of the divine inheritance and self-forfeited away from God’s favour. Our awareness of loss and self-forfeiture springs to life. 

The result was that Paul discovered something in his personal experience. He discovered that the divine injunction towards life, ‘Do this and you will live’ – the injunction towards sensitivity and responsiveness to God and a share in the divine inheritance – was penetrating towards death. It was penetrating towards guilt and condemnation. By means of knowing the divine injunction he came to know loss and self-forfeiture away from God’s favour. Worse still, he came to see his self-forfeiture of this injunction permeating into more and more aspects of his thoughts and behaviour.

So, as a general principle, ‘the injunction having come, the self-forfeiture and loss came up to life, and I [ego] withered away’. The law comes in and I become more and more aware of my self-forfeiture and loss. The meaning is ‘coming up to life again’ - implying that it was previously dormant but was now roused up into new life. Worse still, ‘I’ withered away. This is placed in contrast to ‘I was living’. The effect of the divine injunction was to bring Paul to an awareness of his ‘withering away and dying off’. The essential idea here is that the Law did not answer the purpose that many Jews would claim for it, to cleanse and to give comfort, but that its influence was to produce aggravated, unpardoned guilt and woe. He now saw himself a dead man, dead in sin, dead in law, under a sentence of death. That he had within himself the impulse and energy leading towards death, and all his hopes of eternal life by investing his energy and work is seeking obedience to the law, died at once. ‘I discovered the injunction penetrating towards life - this penetrated towards death’.

Such is the result of knowing divine law. ‘Do this and you will live’ (Luke 10 v 28), but any failure to ‘do this’ does not originate in the injunction itself, but rather in knowing the injunction and by means of this knowledge becoming aware of the extent of loss and self-forfeiture. Our ‘ancient human constitution [is] being corrupted and ruined down from deceitful passionate desires and yearnings’, (Ephesians 4 v 22) – the raw passions and energies inherent in our fleshly constitution.

Principles of living a godly life [42] – Human nature and divine law [2]

 ‘But self-forfeiture and loss, having taken hold of a starting point by means of the injunction, fully worked to fashion within me every aspect of inordinate desire’, (Romans 7 v 8a).

Paul has just said that by means of Covenant or divine law he knows what self-forfeiture and loss is. Covenant Law defines self-forfeiture and loss. Divine law sets boundaries on thoughts, emotions, intentions, speech and behaviours, revealing what God approves of and what He disapproves of. 

So what happens? Knowledge of self-forfeiture and no receipt of a portion (of the divine inheritance) is gained by means of knowing divine law. But knowledge of divine law means that self-forfeiture and loss actively takes hold of a starting point and opportunity presented by means of the injunction. Talking about himself, Paul says that the knowledge of self-forfeiture conveyed by means of divine law fully worked to completion within him. Knowledge of self-forfeiture with regard to covetousness fully worked down within him to produce and accomplish an end result. Namely, this knowledge fashioned and formed all of the individual parts and aspects of covetousness, focused passion, yearning and lusting. The knowledge that Paul attained by means of divine law - that passionate, lustful desire was prohibited - also presented within him the opportunity, the opening and starting point for self-forfeiture and loss. His awareness of what self-forfeiture and loss is with regard to covetousness sprung to life and it worked within him to form self-forfeiture and loss with regard to every aspect of passionate, lustful desire that he possessed. His awareness of self-forfeiture and loss because of his covetousness increased, he saw it as being present in so many aspects of his passionate desires. But it was not the law itself that was producing this result, but rather the ‘self-forfeiture and loss’ within him. It was everywhere within him, often in subtle and unexpected ways. 

The Greek word that Paul uses is ‘hamartia’, which is almost universally translated into English as ‘sin’. In its more strict definition it is a noun derived from ‘A’ – ‘not’ or ‘no’, and ‘méros’ – ‘a part, a share of’, and it emphasises its self-originated or self-empowered nature – in other words, this loss of a share is not originated or empowered by God. Thus, in its fullest sense it is ‘self-forfeiture leading to no-share or portion of the divine inheritance’. It was this ‘self-forfeiture and loss’ that was working within Paul and producing every kind of form of covetousness, which had been defined by divine law. Passionate desire was present in him before he encountered divine law, but knowing the law constituted the initial starting point of knowing the presence and extent of self-forfeiture and loss, which worked within him to form many instances and aspects of self-forfeiture and loss in relation to his passionate desires.

At this point in his discussion, Paul is still thinking primarily of the dynamic process that takes place within ‘unbelievers’ – who are walking around day-by-day down from their flesh, because they are enslaved to their natural, earthy, ancient humanity or physical, fleshly constitution. In other words, this is the dynamic process that takes place when unbelievers encounter divine law. Paul does not introduce the present tense until verse 14. From verse 7 to 13 he uses the past tense, which means that he is referring to himself before God brought him forth. 

Principles of living a godly life [41] – Human nature and divine law [1]

 ‘What then? Will we say ‘The Law of self-forfeiture and loss’? May it not be caused to happen! However, I would absolutely not know self-forfeiture and loss if not by means of Law, for also I would absolutely not know covetousness if the Law had not said, ‘You will not covet’,’ (Romans 7 v 7). 

In verse 5 Paul said that ‘when we existed within the flesh, the passions, the self-forfeiture, actively and effectively worked within our limbs and members through the means of the law, penetrating towards the bringing forth of fruit, the death’. Paul also says elsewhere that ‘law entered close beside in order that the falling away became greater in number’, (Galatians 5 v 20). Law increases the amount of transgressions and the wayward raw passions and energies inherent in the fabric of our fleshly constitution are working in our limbs by means of the law. In other words, divine law is not leading ‘outsiders’ or unbelievers to live a life of set apart cleanliness at all. But when Christians are brought forth by God they are rendered idle with regard to serving God within the sphere of the law.

So Paul immediately anticipates another objection from those who know the law. He frames the objection in terms of a rhetorical question. ‘What then? Will we say ‘the Law of self-forfeiture and loss’?’ Will we say that the Law is at fault? Is Law failing in the purpose of producing cleanliness? Is the Law creating self-forfeiture and loss in us? He answers immediately. ‘May it not be caused to happen!’ 

To illustrate his point he quotes the beginning of the tenth Commandment, ‘You will not covet’, (Exodus 20 v 17; Deuteronomy 5 v 21). The word ‘covet’ means ‘to have focused passion’, ‘to yearn for’, ‘to greatly desire to do or have something’, ‘to long for’, ‘to desire very much’, or ‘to lust after’. Mosaic or Sinai Covenant Law takes an enormous step forward in advance of many other ancient codes, because most of them stopped short at actual action or behaviour. Just a few went on to speech, but few if any laws addressed an individual’s thoughts or passions. But divine law says, ‘You will not covet’, you will not hold on to the thought and passionate desire for something. Coveting proceeds from our heart or deep inner core, (Proverbs 6 v 25), and when it carries across into our behaviour it brings forth self-forfeiture and loss, the thought and desire is brought to completion in the act. 

Paul says ‘in the absence of divine law I would not know that if I covet then I self-forfeit incurring loss. Covenant Law is the means by which I know that I am self-forfeiting. Until the law revealed it, I had no knowledge or consciousness of divine disapproval, self-forfeiture and loss with regard to coveting.’ Without doubt there were those who desired their ‘neighbour’s wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, but before the giving of Covenant Law this would not be readily perceived as a divinely disapproved-of desire for that which was forbidden. Because no written code existed to reveal that God disapproved of such passionate desire. The Apostle did not know covetousness as something that was disapproved-of by God until he was confronted with the law opposing it. The desire might have existed within him, but he would not have known that God disapproved of it to the point of his self-forfeiture and loss. The written codes of divine law place boundaries on his desires, as well as his speech and behaviour, teaching him what God judicially approves of and what He disapproves of. Divine law teaches where lawful indulgence ends, and where self-forfeiture and loss begins.

It is not Divine Law itself that is missing the mark, nor is it failing. So what is the dynamic process that happens? Paul is about to tell us.

Principles of living a godly life [40] – Christians, ‘unbelievers’ and divine law

 ‘Because when we existed within the flesh, the passions, the self-forfeiture and loss were actively and effectively working within our limbs and members through the means of the law, penetrating towards the bringing forth of fruit, the death. 6 But now we are rendered entirely idle away from the law, having died within that holding us down tight, in order that we are serving within new, fresh breath [pneuma] and absolutely not within obsolete writing’, (Romans 7 v 5, 6).

Paul is speaking to Hebrew Christians who know divine law, (verse 1), and said that the law only has authority whilst an individual is alive. When they die, the law is rendered idle. Speaking to his fellow Jewish Christians says, ‘brothers, you also were put to death, the law by means of the body of the Messiah penetrating into you becoming another, the having been aroused from out of the dead, in order that we begin and continue to bear the fruit of God’, (verse 4). I explored this in the previous two posts. 

Divine law had been given to God’s chosen ethnic group – the Jews – as part of the Sinai Covenant. They possessed it as an advantage and privilege. But now Paul is telling these Hebrew Christians that their ‘old self’ has died and that therefore divine law is rendered idle. He now begins to explain why this is the case even for Jewish Christians. In doing so, he first looks back to how these Jews existed before they became Christians.

They existed within the realm of the flesh like everyone else. They were concerned to increase their wealth, comfort and status, and they sought physical pleasures and stimulation. As Jews they were familiar with the written codes of the Sinai Covenant, but this knowledge did not increase their godliness or cleanliness. In fact, just the opposite happened. Why? What was the dynamic process that was taking place? It was this: inherent within their physical constitution, within their flesh, the energy and impetus of raw passions – deep strong emotions – penetrating towards ‘self-forfeiture and loss’, actively worked within their limbs with the result of bringing forth ‘fruit’. They carried the passions, impulses, inclinations and working energies within the fabric of their flesh across into their speech and behaviour, bringing about ‘death’ – insensitivity, unresponsiveness and the darkness of ignorance with regard to God. These disapproved-of energies and passions were defined and increased by means of divine law, resulting in divine condemnation and disapproval, and the judicial sentence of separation. That is the dynamic process that takes place when those existing within the flesh turn to the written codes and regulations of law – including divine law. Wayward passions and working energies within our physical constitution lead us to death by means of the law. ‘Law is working down settled anger’, (Romans 4 v 15a).

‘But now…’. Paul then looks at the situation of these Jews now that God has brought them forth as Christians. A radical yet subtle change has taken place as I have explained in the previous posts. This polarising change includes the death of their old human appearance, such that they ‘are rendered entirely idle away from the law’. They ‘have died within the sphere of that holding us down tight’, (verse 6a). The dynamic process that I have just described in the previous paragraph is a trap that holds its victims tight, resulting in death. But now, the ‘old self’ even of those who possess and know the written codes of Covenant law, has died. In addition, they are transferred from out of the authority of the Levitical priesthood into a new priesthood such that they are rendered entirely idle away from the written codes of Levitical law and the Sinai Covenant. 

‘Ah!’ says the Christian legalist. ‘What Paul means is that they are rendered idle from ceremonial law, but not the moral law!’ But the Apostles do not make such a distinction. When they talk of law they speak of the law as a unified whole. As Paul indicates at the end of verse 6, by ‘law’ he means ‘obsolete writing’, the written codes and injunctions set out through Moses. The Ten Commandments, written in stone. The Levitical law, the written codes of the Sinai Covenant. 

But this does not mean that Christians are therefore opposed to divine law. They are not ‘anti law’ or ‘antinomian’. It does not mean that they now have permissive licence to do what they want. Christians, including Jewish Christians, are rendered entirely idle from the law ‘in order that they are serving’. Their calling is to serve and honour God and His Messiah who has paid the price to buy them back and is now their new Lord. 

So, if Christians are called to serve and honour God day-by-day, set apart from the worldly arrangement and its values, but they are rendered idle from the obsolete written codes of divine law, then how do they do this? How do they know what to do? Paul tells us the answer in verse 6 – Christians ‘are serving within new, fresh breath’ [pneuma]. Uniquely for Christians, the Breath (Pneuma) that is different and set apart from the world (hagios) has been given to dwell within them. So Paul exhorts Christians to serve within the sphere of the fresh, new realm of the breath – to walk around within the realm of the Breath.

Principles of living a godly life [39] – Christians and divine law [6]

 At this present time Christians exist at a kind of mid-point, in a transitional state. They are no longer who they once were but their redemption has not yet reached its end point. Their old human appearance is dead thanks to being brought forth by God in union with the Messiah by means of the Breath, but they are not yet what they will be, indeed, it has not yet been revealed what they will be. Instead, the ‘new and fresh is coming into being’. Christians are in the middle of a transitional process. Their new formation has begun but it has not yet reached its culmination. 

So we have this situation. On being brought forth by God their old human appearance has died and a new formation has come into being. Reminding ourselves of what Paul said in the first four verses of Romans chapter 7, the fact that their old human appearance has died means that – 

The written codes of divine law have been rendered idle in terms of trying to obey these codes as a means of obtaining divine approval day-by-day or in terms of ultimate and final approval on the Day of Judgement. 

Christians are joined in union with the Messiah who has fulfilled the requirements of divine law in his body. He is the spotless Lamb of God. 

Because of this union, Christians are freed from condemnation within the sphere of the written codes of divine law. Instead the law penetrates into them becoming ‘the roused from out of the dead’. 

In II Corinthians 11 v 2 Paul says of the Corinthian Christians, ‘I have joined you to one husband, a set apart virgin to present and stand beside the Messiah’. He speaks of Jesus as their husband because they exist in union with him as their Lord and head.

The purpose of the death of the Christian’s ‘old human appearance’ and their union with the Messiah by means of the Breath, such that they penetrate into becoming ‘the aroused from out of the dead’ is that they actively ‘bear fruit for God’ in their speech and behaviour. They do not seek a life of godliness and good in order to obtain or maintain divine approval by working and expending their energy in such behaviour, but rather, out of loyal service for the honour and praise of God. Such clean speech and behaviour is the ‘fruit of the Breath’, (Galatians 5 v 22). 

Having been brought forth by God, Christians do not own themselves. I have often heard ‘outsiders’ or ‘unbelievers’ say in defence of their preferred behaviour, ‘It’s my body, or my life, I can do what I like’. This is not a Christian sentiment. Christians are bond-slaves of their Lord and Master the Messiah. They have been bought back, redeemed or purchased with a price, and placed in God’s household. By right of purchase, Christians are therefore under an obligation to behave as their Messiah directs. The Messiah purchases the taking away of the Christian’s condemnation by means of the shedding of his own lifeblood and in doing so he places upon them a new obligation to obedience. Those who are redeemed from out of slavery or captivity to self-forfeiture and condemnation are the purchased servants of him who redeemed them – as Paul goes on to say in the next verses in Romans 7. 

Principles of living a godly life [38] – Christians and divine law [5]

Paul has stated and illustrated the principle that the law only has authority whilst a man is alive. When a man dies the law is rendered idle. He then applies this statement to Christians, especially to Hebrew Christians – ‘those knowing law’, (Romans 7 v 1). ‘So then my brothers, you also were put to death, the law by means of the body of the Messiah penetrating into you becoming another, the having been aroused from out of the dead, in order that we begin and continue to bear the fruit of God’, (Romans 7 v 4).

OK Hold on to your hats and take a deep breath….

Paul says that Christians, including Jewish Christians who know the law, have been put to death and therefore the law is rendered idle. Earlier, Paul has said that Christians are ‘planted together with the Messiah so as to be coming forth the resemblance of His death…knowing this, that our old human appearance was crucified together with [the Messiah], in order that the body of self-forfeiture and loss is brought to an end. We are no longer serving self-forfeiture and loss’, (Romans 6 v 5, 6). 

What does Paul mean when he says that the Christian’s ‘old human appearance was crucified’? What is the Christian’s ‘old human appearance’? A polarising difference exists between Christians and unbelievers. The natural, inherited constitution of every individual is described in Scripture as the ‘old human appearance’, or as the ‘natural, sensuous earthy man’, or the ‘old and ancient self’. Within our ‘old human appearance’ we are earthy, sensuous individuals who rely on our sense of the tangible. Impulses within our physical flesh lead us to a condition in which we don’t take hold of and welcome the Breath of God. That which is of the Breath of God seems to be dull, absurd foolishness. We don’t have a natural ability to perceive, recognise or be persuaded to the point of obedience regarding the Messiah and or what is of the Breath, no matter how hard we may try. The theological principle is this: 

That which is of the Breath of God is discerned, distinguished, examined and apprehended only through the assistance of the Breath of God

We may understand the words and concepts in Scripture, but no matter how educated and intelligent we may be, we remain without persuasion when it comes to what is true to the facts with regard to God, His Messiah and the intangible unseen realm. We remain in, and prefer, darkness to light and thus we remain unbelievers, penetrating toward the judicial condemnation of God.

But once God brings forth those He has selected, they are described as being a ‘new formation’ - they are no longer who they once were. Having been effectively being brought forth, a fundamental change has taken place within them, which means that they are not the same as they we were before – ‘our old human appearance was crucified together with [the Messiah]’ (Romans 6 v 6). This happened to them and was completed in the past, when they were effectively brought forth. Thus Paul says here in Romans 7 v 4 – ‘my brothers, you also were put to death’, you Jews who know the law and whom God as brought forth by means of the Messiah – you also were put to death, your ‘old self’ was crucified together with the Messiah. 

The next phrase is more difficult to translate and I consider that many translations are misleading. Translators are forced to add words in English that are not present in the Greek text, in order to convey the interpretation that they consider Paul intended. But I have presented what the Greek text says – ‘the law by means of the body of the Messiah penetrating into you becoming another, the having been aroused from out of the dead’. All the word studies and lexicons fail to make mention of the word ‘law’ – ‘nomos’ – in this particular verse. It would seem that they are unable to determine the particular or specific meaning of the word ‘law’ in this verse. Translators and commentators add the English word ‘to’, thereby giving us the phrase - ‘you were put to death to the law’. But the word ‘to’ is not there in the original Greek. 

So what is Paul saying? I consider that Paul is saying that the law – the written codes of divine law – by means of the body of the Messiah penetrates into them becoming another. Christians are placed in union with the Messiah by means of the Breath. Their ‘old self’ is crucified, put to death together with him, because of their union with him. But the law is fulfilled or brought to completion by means of the body of the Messiah, the Lamb of God without stain or blemish, and therefore, Christians are roused up to Life with him, again because of their union with him. In this way they are judicially approved, and the law penetrates into them becoming ‘another’ – a ‘new self’. 

What does this mean? It means that those whom God has brought forth are ‘the having been aroused from out of the dead’. The rousing up from out of the dead has already begun. Christians are no longer ‘under the law’ because they have been crucified with the Messiah and their ‘old self’ has died and therefore the law has been rendered idle. But because of their union with the Messiah they are also ‘roused up from out of the dead’ to a position of divine approval, because the law has been fulfilled and completed by means of the body of the Messiah. The law, being fulfilled, penetrates into Christians becoming ‘the roused up from the dead’ at this present time because of their union within the Messiah. ‘If therefore then anyone [is] within the Messiah, [they are] a fresh, new, unused formation. The beginnings are coming near – look! Fresh, new, unused is caused to come into being’, (II Corinthians 5 v 17). This has happened in order that ‘we begin and continue to bear the fruit of God’.

….and breathe out and relax.