I Timothy 1 v 6, 7 Missing the mark and law

 ‘Which some, having missed the mark, have turned away into empty talk, 7 wishing to be teachers of the law, not exercising their minds neither to understand what they are saying nor around which they emphatically assert’, (I Timothy 1 v 6, 7). 

Already, some of the teachers in the Ephesian assembly had missed the mark. They had turned away from the essence of the gospel message into unprofitable ‘empty talk’, into babbling. They desired to be teachers of Covenant law. Today, Christian legalists do not usually go this far. Although insisting on using divine law as a ‘spur’ to urge wayward Christians to turn back to the Messiah, Christian legalists do not usually become teachers, experts or consultants specialising in Covenant or Levitical law. Rather, they tend to constantly refer to the ‘Moral law’ and use ‘proof texts’ to ‘prod’ wayward Christians to turn to the Messiah in repentance. In public prayers they often talk about how Christians have fallen short of the standards and ideals of God’s ‘Moral law’, and about how unworthy Christians are in their day-to-day lives. If someone is persuaded of the importance and relevance of divine law to living a godly life, then becoming a teacher of law is a logical and consistent step to take, since they regard the law as being essential to godliness. But Paul objects to such reasoning and says that those wishing to be teachers of the law were ‘not exercising their minds’. There it is again, Paul’s emphasis on the Christian’s mind such that they think and reason things through to a conclusion in the light of the gospel. Paul says that those Christian teachers wishing to be teachers of the law are not making the effort to use their minds in order to come to the right conclusion. Furthermore, these Ephesian teachers were emphatically asserting their opinions. They were making bold, confident statements about the law as they sought to impose Levitical law on Christians at Ephesus. But Paul says that they don’t understand what they are saying. He goes on to explain what he means.

Principles of living a godly life [72] - Present hardship – Future honour [4]

 ‘For we appreciate that the whole of the original formation is jointly groaning and jointly suffering birth pains up to the present time. 23 Not alone, but on the contrary, even ourselves, possessing the first-fruit of the Breath [Pneuma], even we ourselves are groaning within ourselves, eagerly awaiting adoption as sons, the full ransom and release of our body’, (Romans 8 v 22, 23). 

The opposite of ‘the whole of the original formation’ (verse 22) is ‘even ourselves, possessing the first-fruit of the Breath’ (verse 23), or Christians. As Benson’s Commentary states, this shows ‘that the apostle is speaking, not of [animals] and inanimate creation but of mankind’. Generally speaking there is a discontentment or sense of lack of fulfilment within humanity. The whole of the empty, aimless, transient original formation that lacks usefulness ‘is jointly groaning and jointly suffering birth pains up to the present time’, (verse 22). Humanity, within its original formation, is united in a condition of sorrow, continued suffering and existential crisis. That fact that Paul is speaking about humanity is confirmed by his emphasis on ‘the attentive thinking and supposition of the original formation’, (verse 19). What is this attentive thinking and supposition? Paul has told us throughout his letter to the Romans. Existing within their original formation, humanity is ‘holding down the truth within injustice and what is not rightwise’, (Romans 1 v 18). They ‘became ineffectual, unproductive and without usefulness within their thinking, and their deep inner core, lacking synthesised understanding began and continued to be darkened. 22 Asserting to be clear and wise, they became dull, sluggish and insipid, 23 and they changed the honour and praiseworthiness of God into a likeness, an image, of mortal man, flying animals, four-footed beasts and crawling things. 24 Therefore God handed them over away from close beside, within focus on passionate desire of their hearts’, (Romans 1 v 21 - 24). Enslaved to their fleshly constitution, ‘the down from the flesh are existing thinking, judging and caring for that of the flesh’, (Romans 8 v 5), constructing and manufacturing that of the flesh, (Romans 1 v 24 – 32; Galatians 5 v 19 – 21).

But humanity existing within its original formation is not groaning in pain alone. On the contrary, ‘even ourselves possessing the firstfruit of the Breath [Pneuma], even we ourselves are groaning within ourselves’, (verse 23). Christians are also groaning within themselves in constriction. Why are Christians groaning within themselves? Because Christians are eagerly expecting ‘adoption as sons, the full ransom and release of our body’. We have seen that Christians are existing within their ‘clay vessel’, the original formation that is a ‘body of death’. They are ‘groaning and weighed down on the basis that they do not wish to be stripped out of clothing, but to be clothed over, so that ‘the subject to death’ be swallowed down by Life’, (II Corinthians 5 v 4). Christians are ‘eagerly awaiting adoption as sons’. The Christian has received the Breath of God and His Messiah and is already an adopted child of God, (verses15, 16.) But this adoption still has to be brought to completion, which will not be until the coming of the Messiah as King of kings. At that time they will receive ‘the full ransom and release of their body’. The original formation of flesh and blood, of a mortal body, cannot enter the Kingdom of God. Christians are groaning within, eagerly awaiting the release of their existing vessel of clay, eagerly expecting it to be changed.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [13] – Repentance [11 of 12]

 Inevitably there are some who seem to embrace the Christian faith but then, for one reason or another, they fall away and perhaps if they are disillusioned enough, they even begin and continue to ridicule and scorn the Messiah that they once seemed to embrace. Whilst they persist in this wayward scornful attitude, the writer of the letter to the Hebrews has this to say. ‘Therefore, sending away the beginning teaching on the basis of maturity…. we will do this if God permits, because the once-enlightened, tasting of the heavenly gift, becoming sharers of the set-apart Breath 5 and tasting the virtue of God’s utterance and also intended age power, 6 falling alongside, are unable to restore themselves again penetrating into a change of mind and perception afterwards, crucifying again the Son of God and putting him to open shame’, (Hebrews 6 v 1, 3 – 6). Verses 4 - 6 are difficult verses to translate precisely and I have presented them as best as I can. The reference seems to be to those who have made a profession of faith in the past, but who have then turned away and are now treating the gospel with scorn, openly and actively ridiculing the Messiah. Whilst they remain in such an attitude of mind they are crucifying the Son of God all over again. Such an obstinate and active opposition of mind renders them unable to change their minds after further thought or after a re-presentation of the gospel. They are simply too opposed to the Messiah and the gospel to be persuaded. 

Esau is presented as another example of someone who was unable to show evidence of thinking again. He had sold his birthright – his right to an inheritance – and when he realised what he had missed out on, he tried to show that he had changed his mind. The author of the letter to the Hebrews says this about him. ‘Because you know that even afterwards, wishing to inherit the honour and praise, his change of mind and perception afterwards was rejected after examination, because he found no place even though he sought after it with tears’, (Hebrews 12 v 17). Esau pleaded with tears in his eyes that he had changed his mind about selling his birthright and that he wanted to turn back and reverse his decision. But on closer examination his plea was rejected because it was determined that he simply wanted the honour and praise that he had forfeited by his actions.

Finally we have this statement with regard to the unexpectedly long period of time that seemed to be occurring without the Lord returning. Many Christians, including the Apostle Paul, considered that the return of the Lord was imminent. Yet as time went on it appeared to be delayed. But Peter declared, ‘The Lord is absolutely not delaying the promise in the way that some think of delay, but is patient toward you, not intending any to perish but on the contrary, all to enter and hold penetration into a change of mind and perception afterwards’, (II Peter 3 v 9). Despite Paul’s belief that Jesus was returning very soon, he qualifies this by saying elsewhere that the Lord will not return until the full number of Gentiles are brought in, (Romans 11 v 25). And John says that he will not return until the full number of martyrs have come in, (Revelation 6 v 11).

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [12] – Repentance [10 of 12]

 Christian leaders did not merely keep repeating the basic message of the gospel. Like the writer of the letter to the Hebrews, they urged Christians toward growth and maturity, and to more advanced teaching. ‘Therefore, letting go from the beginning word of the Messiah on the basis of maturity, not carrying once more the laying of a foundation of a change of mind and perception afterwards away from dead actions and entrustment on the basis of God to the point of obedience….’, (Hebrews 6 v 1). Once an individual changed their mind and moved towards persuasion within the Messiah, the foundations about baptism and obedient godly behaviour were taught such that teaching and instruction could then build on these foundations to enable the Christian to move towards further establishment. The focus moved towards more advanced teaching and towards Christians living a godly life day-by-day. 

Needless to say, some Christians fell into error, exercising speech and behaviour that God disapproves of. If such errors were serious enough, such as bringing the gospel into disrepute, such Christians incurred admonishment from the Apostles and overseers.  

When Christians were admonished and corrected by the Apostle Paul because of their wayward behaviour, some of them experienced grief and sadness. Paul responded by saying, ‘I am not joyful that you were grieved and pained, but that you grieved penetrating into a change of mind and perception afterwards; because you were grieved down from God in order that you suffer loss within nothing from out of us. 10 Because down from God, grief works down to penetrate into a change of mind and perception afterwards without regret, but grief of the orderly arrangement works down death’, (II Corinthians 7 v 9, 10). For various reasons, despite embracing the good news of the Messiah, the Christian life is not all smiles and glib happiness. For example, a Christian’s wayward speech and behaviour can lead them to grief and sadness. In these verses Paul explains the difference between grief down from God that leads to a change of mind; and the grief within the world that leads to insensitivity and unresponsiveness to God. 

 

And of course, Christians encounter enticements and opposition of one kind or another when they declare their faith in the Messiah. When attempts are made by Christians to restore their brothers and sisters who are in error, such wayward Christians may react with opposition and they may resent such interventions. How are concerned Christians instructed to respond to such resentment and opposition? ‘But, bond-servant of the Lord, it is not necessary to quarrel but to be gentle toward all, able to teach, patiently forbearing, correcting those setting themselves in opposition within gentleness in case at some time God offers a change of mind and perception afterwards penetrating into knowledge of truth’, (II Timothy 2 v 24, 25). Paul says that such opposition or resentment does not present well-meaning Christians with a justification to engage in quarrels and arguments. The Greek philosophers on Mars Hill had invited Paul to speak about the gospel, but when they heard about the resurrection some of them reacted with scornful ridicule. Paul did not then engage in passionate arguments and disputes with them, he did not engage in ‘apologetics’ in order to try and justify the gospel to them. Instead he exercised spiritual discernment and walked away, not willing to throw pearls in front of swine. 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [11] – Repentance [9 of 12]

 With regard to the ill-treatment that Jesus received we read this. ‘It has been written in this manner: The Messiah experiences ill treatment and rouses from out of lifelessness the third day to herald a change of thinking and perception afterwards and the sending away of no share and self-forfeiture on the basis of his name towards all ethnic groups, beginning away from Jerusalem’, (Luke 24 v 46, 47). In previous posts we have seen that although this good news concerning Jesus and the sending away of no share is presented to all ethnic groups, the initial focus of the New Testament in the gospels and the early chapters of Acts is on God’s chosen ethnic group, the Jews. This good news was initially presented to Jews, because as God’s chosen ethnic group they had many advantages that prepared them for the Messiah, such as the Law and the Prophets. But because of their persistent disobedience, since the Babylonian Captivity Jews have been left to their own empty thinking as God had withdrawn Himself from them. As a result, the Jews rejected Jesus, seeing him as a false Messiah. Thus the message to Jews was that ‘The God of our fathers rouses Jesus, whom you lay violent hands upon to hang upon a tree. The right hand of God lifts him up and exalts him as chief leader and deliverer, to give Israel a change of thinking and perception afterwards and a sending away of no share and self-forfeiture’, (Acts 5 v 30, 31). Again we read, ‘Of this, away from the seed [of David], God, down from a promise, brings Israel Jesus the Deliverer, John heralding beforehand, in front of his coming, an immersion of a change of thinking and perception afterwards to all the people of Israel’, (Acts 13 v 23, 24). But many Jews rejected Jesus and presumed that they were within God’s favour simply because they were descended from Abraham. They refused to acknowledge Jesus as their Messiah, leading Paul to ask, ‘do you despise and scorn the wealth of His useful kindness, patience and tolerance, unaware that God’s useful kindness leads you towards a change of mind and perception afterwards?’, (Romans 2 v 4). 

In due course, other ethnic groups, referred to in Scripture as ‘Greeks’ or ‘Gentiles’, were seen to respond to the gospel and this was reported to the council of Jewish Christians in Jerusalem. ‘Hearing these things they were tranquil and honoured God saying, ‘Therefore God gives a change of thinking and perception afterwards towards life even to other ethnic groups’, (Acts 11 v 18). Paul testified to the Ephesians saying among other things that he 'shrunk back under nothing that they carried together, except declaring to you and publicly teaching you also from house to house, giving solemn evidence, God penetrating a change of thinking and perception afterwards towards both Jewish and Greeks, and entrustment within our Lord Jesus’, (Acts 20 v 20, 21). And again, ‘…but first to those within Damascus and then all Jerusalem and the region of Judea, and to the Gentiles, I announced to think and perceive afterwards and return on the basis of God, accomplishing actions worthy of a change of mind and perception afterwards’, (Acts 26 v 20)

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [10] – Repentance [8 of 12]

 ‘Metánoia’ is the noun that corresponds to the verb ‘metanoeó’ that I mentioned in the previous post. ‘Metánoia’ refers to someone who has ‘a change of thought and perception afterwards’ – an ‘after-thought’. It occurs twenty-two times in the New Testament and it presents the same themes as the verb ‘metanoeó’.

In Matthew’s gospel, when John the Baptist rebuked the Pharisees and Sadducees who came to him for baptism, he criticised their presumptions. ‘Therefore construct fruit suitable to a change of thought and perception afterwards, and so do not think to say within yourselves, ‘We possess Father Abraham’, (Matthew 3 v 8, 9a). See also Luke 3 v 8. We see here the differentiation between the thought itself and the behaviour that follows. John describes the behaviour as the ‘fruit’ or produce of thought. Thought that exists within us is thoroughly carried across to the other side and manifest in our observable actions or behaviour. 

John the Baptist says, ‘Indeed, I immerse you within water penetrating towards a change of thought and perception…’ (Matthew 3 v 11). The ‘thinking and perceiving afterwards’ is the ‘seed’ of the ‘fruit’ of behaviour. Thus, ‘John came to be within the wilderness immersing and heralding immersion, a change of thought and perception afterwards penetrating towards a sending away of no share and self-forfeiture’, (Mark 1 v 4). See also Luke 3 v 3. Paul also testifies to this process, ‘Then Paul said, ‘John baptised an immersion into a change of thinking and perception afterwards, telling the people penetrating towards the coming after him in order that they entrust, they exist, within Jesus’, (Acts 19 v 4). The ‘thought afterwards’ penetrates into a change of behaviour and entrustment in the Messiah to the point of obedience.

This thinking and perceiving after hearing the gospel is necessary because of our natural ignorance and the mistaken patterns of thought that arise from the energies within our fleshly constitution. These fleshly patterns of thought lead towards insensitivity and unresponsiveness to God, and leads some to conclude that God approves of them. But Jesus said, ‘I have not come to summon judicially approved by God, on the contrary, those falling short and widely missing the mark, penetrating towards a change of thought and perception afterwards’, (Luke 5 v 32). 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [9] – Repentance [7 of 12]

 Despite being God’s chosen ethnic group, Jews remained resistant to the gospel. They remained without persuasion with regard to their Messiah. But the exhortation to think and perceive afterwards did not remain restricted to Jews. Following the ‘Great Commission’ given to the Apostles in Matthew 28 v 19, the good news of the Messiah was heralded not only to Jews but also to other, non-Jewish ethnic groups as well, referred to in the New Testament as ‘Greeks’ or ‘Gentiles’. We see this development emerge in the narrative in Acts of the Apostles. As with Jews, Gentiles are urged to repent – to think and perceive afterwards.

On one occasion Paul was invited to speak to Gentile philosophers who loved to debate on Mars Hill. Introducing the gospel Paul said, ‘Indeed therefore, overlooking the times of ignorance, God at this present time instructs beside all people everywhere to think and perceive afterwards because He stands a day within which He intends to judicially separate out the inhabited within justice’, (Acts 17 v 30, 31b). After the death and standing up again of Jesus, the good news was extended beyond Jews. Thus God exhorts non-Jews to think and perceive after hearing the good news – to reason things through to their conclusion. This was Paul’s usual approach – declare the gospel and exhort hearers to think, reason things through and perceive afterwards. ‘…first to those within Damascus and then all Jerusalem and the region of Judea, and to the Gentiles, I announced to think and perceive afterwards and return on the basis of God, accomplishing actions worthy of a change of mind [metanoia]’, (Acts 26 v 20). In this verse we see a clear distinction between thinking and behaviour. The order is this – 

        Hear the announcement of the gospel

        Think and reason it through to a conclusion afterwards

        Perceive the reality, the truth

Then -

        Apply this enlightened knowledge 

        Exercise mastery over your body 

        Turn around or return to God and

        Accomplish behaviour, construct fruit, worthy of this change of mind

Many, but not all of these kinds of references to repentance look at Jewish and Gentile responses to the heralding of the gospel. 

Less often a verse addresses a Jew or a Christian who has fallen into error and behaving in a way that misses the mark when seeking to live a godly life. Then the procedure is this – 

After falling into error 

        Think and perceive the reality, the truth of your error 

Then -

        Apply enlightened knowledge

        Exercise mastery over your body

        Turn around or return to God and

        Accomplish behaviour, construct fruit, worthy of this change of mind

Thus Paul says, ‘…lest when I come again my God humble me towards you and I grieve much over those sinning previously but absolutely not having thought and perceived afterwards on the basis of the impurity, the harlotry that they are accomplishing’, (II Corinthians 12 v 21). Similarly in the book of Revelation we have this verse that I propose is a prophecy written mainly to Jews. ‘Therefore recollect from what place you have fallen and think and perceive afterwards, and construct the most important actions. But if not, I come to you and will remove your lampstand from out of its place if you do not think and perceive afterwards’, (Revelation 2 v 5). Similarly there is this, ‘…some of you hold to the teaching of Balaam…. In the same way, some of you also hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans. 16 Therefore, think and perceive afterwards! But if not, I come to you quickly and will contend with them within the sword of my mouth’, (Revelation 2 v 14 - 16).  

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [8] – Repentance [6 of 12]

 Moving away from the gospels, the initial emphasis in the book of Acts still centres on Jews as God’s chosen ethnic group, with calls being made to them to repent – to think and perceive afterwards. At Pentecost the disciples were filled with the set-apart Breath and began to speak in tongues, and Peter addressed the gathered crowd of Jews to explain what was happening. He told them, ‘Think and perceive afterwards and be baptised within the name of Jesus the Messiah, every one of you. Towards the letting go and sending away of your no share and self-forfeiture, and you will receive the free gift of the set apart Breath’ [Pneuma], (Acts 2 v 38). There is the basic dynamic of the gospel when it comes to those who are not persuaded. 

Peter says a similar thing later on in Solomon’s colonnade in the Temple. After explaining to Jews about Jesus and using examples from Jewish history and references to their Scriptures, he says, ‘Therefore, think and perceive afterwards and return towards the whole smearing out of your no share and self-forfeitures’ (Acts 3 v 19). So the initial emphasis in the early chapters of Acts is still on Jews as God’s chosen ethnic group, with a call that after hearing the gospel they think, reason things through and perceive.

Similarly, if a Jew exhibited behaviour that God disapproves of, they were exhorted to think and perceive afterwards. Thus when Simon tried to buy the ability to practice divine favours from the Apostles, Peter rebuked him. ‘Therefore think and perceive afterwards, away from this wickedness of yours, and earnestly request the Lord whether indeed you will be forgiven the purpose and intent of your deep inner core’, (Acts 8 v 22). The exhortation to him is to re-appraise his behaviour and intentions in the light of future judgement.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [7] – Repentance [5 of 12]

 In the gospels, when it comes to ‘repentance’, the focus on is on Jews as God’s chosen ethnic group, and their thinking and perceiving after they have heard the good news proclaimed. ‘Repentance’ is, by enlarge, centred on unfaithful, wayward Jews re-assessing their behaviour and lifestyle in relation to God. Ultimately it is a call for Jews to turn away from worldly attitudes and behaviours and to re-appraise the values and principles that they are living by, because their promised Messiah and the kingdom is coming near.    

In chapter 17 of Luke’s gospel, the focus shifts to Jews who have been wronged or treated unfairly by a fellow Jew. How was a Jew to react if a fellow member of God’s chosen ethnic group was missing the mark or behaving unjustly toward him? Was the Jew who was being treated unfairly to start lecturing the offender about Covenant Law? Was he to regard the offender with a superior sense of contempt from a position of self-righteousness? Was he to hold a grudge even if the offender apologised and sought to make restitution? 

Jesus said, ‘Pay attention to yourselves. If your brother misses the mark and errs, admonish him, and if he thinks and perceives afterwards, send him forth and forgive him. If he misses the mark toward you seven times in a day and seven times turns toward you saying, ‘I am thinking and perceiving afterwards’, you will send him forth and forgive him’, (Luke 17 v 3, 4). Yes, by all means, point out their error if you are being wronged. But if the brother who is in error considers his speech and behaviour afterwards and accepts his error, then the onus is on you to send the error away. You are to forget about the error and forgive him. How many times should you forgive such a person? Seven times a day if necessary.    

This is surely what we hope for from God as Christians. We fall into error and come to God in prayer, acknowledge our error and seek to turn away from it, requesting that God forgive us. But we find that there are some errors that are persistent. We fall into such an error again and once again we sincerely repeat our request for forgiveness. Then we fall into the same error yet again. In such cases we are grateful for God’s forbearance, patience and mercy in the light of our weakness. Jesus expects both Jews and Christians to imitate this love with regard to each other – to show practical, beneficial love to one another. This is his primary instruction.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [5] – Repentance [3 of 12]

 The call to repent meant that hearers were to think and perceive after hearing the gospel, or a call to godliness, or after they had seen the power of God, such as in a miracle. They were to use their intellect and their minds concerning what had been said and/or what they had seen, in order to come to a conclusion. But different people came to different conclusions.

Thus, observing sad events sometimes led people to draw the wrong conclusions. Jesus refers to two such events in Luke 13 and makes some comments to the Jews who observed them. Pilate had mixed the blood of Galileans with their sacrifices, and Jesus said, ‘Are you supposing that these Galilean sinners came alongside all the Galileans because they experienced this ill treatment? 3 I say to you by no means, not at all. But on the contrary, if lest you are thinking and perceiving afterwards, you will fully lose in the same way. 4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell, killing them. Are you supposing that these debtors came alongside the people dwelling in Jerusalem? 5 3 I say to you by no means, not at all. But on the contrary, if lest you are thinking and perceiving afterwards, you will fully lose in the same way’, (Luke 13 v 3 – 5). 

The Greek phraseology is slightly complex but what Jesus seems to be saying is this - ‘Do you think that those who have died in this way are now being honoured and rewarded by God? Do you think because they have died in this way that they have now joined an illustrious company of the divinely approved? On the contrary, unless you think again you also will lose everything in the same way - suddenly and completely’. 

Many Jews boasted of their advantages and privileges because they were members of God’s chosen ethnic group. They were descended from their patriarch, Abraham, to whom God gave many promises, and they possessed the prophets and divine Law for example. Some of them presumed that because they were born Jews they were therefore destined for divine favour and a divine inheritance regardless of their behaviour. Not so, says Jesus. Unless you think again after seeing such sad events you also will suddenly and unexpectedly lose everything. 

Jesus was speaking to non-religious Jews who nevertheless presumed that they were in a state of divine favour. We sometimes see the same attitude today in some unbelievers who presume that in the end, if an all-loving God exists, He will forgive them and welcome them into paradise – after all, they live in a ‘Christian country’ and they are ‘trying their best’. When faced with a tragic event involving the unexpected death of a friend or relative, many people often comfort themselves with similar presumptions. ‘They are up there now in peace, looking down on us until we meet again’. But Jesus says, ‘On the contrary, unless you think differently afterwards, you also will suddenly and unexpectedly lose in the same way’.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [4] – Repentance [2 of 12]

 In the New Testament, the word ‘metanoeó’, often translated into English as ‘repent’, means ‘to think and perceive afterwards’. Its first occurrence is in Matthew chapter 3. ‘In those days John the Baptist came near, proclaiming and heralding in the wilderness of Judea 2 saying, ‘Think and perceive afterwards, because the Kingdom of the heavens is coming near’, (Matthew 3 v 1, 2). This call to ‘think afterwards because the kingdom of the heavens in coming near’ seems to be the essence of John’s message as well as the conclusion of his proclamation. As a result of his message his hearers were to think and perceive after what has been said, to use their intellect and their minds with what had been said in order to come to a conclusion. As with the Apostle Paul in I Corinthians, so also with John the Baptist – John addresses the minds of his hearers. 

Later on Jesus began to herald the same message. ‘Away from that time Jesus began proclaiming, saying, ‘Think and perceive afterwards, because the Kingdom of the heavens is coming near’, (Matthew 4 v 17). Mark’s gospel records it this way, ‘After the surrendering up of John, Jesus came into Galilee proclaiming and heralding the good news of God 15 saying, “The season is made full and the Kingdom of God is coming near. Think and perceive afterwards and be persuaded within the good news to the point of obedience’ (Mark 1 v 14, 15). Like John and the Apostle Paul, Jesus addressed the minds of his hearers. Having heard his proclamation they are to think and reason afterwards with they have heard, so as to bring it to a conclusion.

Indeed, Jesus rebuked those who did not use their mind and reason abilities in this way after they had witnessed his power - presumably his miracles. ‘At that time he [Jesus] began reproaching the towns within which most of his power and ability came to happen, because they did not think and perceive afterwards. 21 ‘Alas, you, Chorazin! Alas, you, Bethsaida! Because if the powers and abilities happening within you took place in Tyre and Sidon they would possibly have thought and perceived afterwards long ago, within sackcloth and ashes’, (Matthew 11 v 20, 21). See also: Luke 10 v 13. Teaching and proclamation was no mere abstract theoretical exercise. Jesus, John the Baptist and the Apostles were not presenting a lesson in abstract, academic theological theory. In thinking things through afterwards these hearers were meant to thoroughly carry their conclusions from within across into their practical behaviour. Jesus said that as a result of thinking and perceiving afterwards, those in Tyre and Sidon would probably be in ‘sackcloth and ashes’ – indicating mourning and regret for their wayward behaviour - as they returned to God. Effective hearers don’t just come to an abstract theoretical, doctrinal or theological conclusion – their thinking is carried over into their speech and behaviour. But the initial emphasis, the seed of this change of behaviour, is the mind - thinking and reasoning afterwards with something that has been said or witnessed.

We can see the emphasis on the mind time and time again in the New Testament. ‘The people of Nineveh will stand up with this generation within the judgement and will judge it down, because they thought and perceived afterwards towards the proclamation of Jonah, and look, here greater than Jonah’, (Matthew 12 v 41). See also: Luke 11 v 32. At one point Jesus sent his disciples out in pairs and in Mark’s gospel we read, ‘Going out they proclaimed and heralded in order that they [the hearers] think and perceive afterwards’, (Mark 6 v 12). 

There we see the meaning of the call to repentance.

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [3] – Repentance [1 of 12]

 What happens when a Christian engages in wayward behaviour that God disapproves of? Christians often talk about ‘repentance’, by which they often mean feeling a sense of regret and turning back to God with sadness and grief at their wayward behaviour, together with a resolution and desire not to repeat it. But what do the Hebrew and Greek words translated into English as ‘repent’ actually mean?

There are lots of calls to repentance in the New Testament, particularly in the gospels with regard to Jews. We also see such calls in the Old Testament, where the Hebrew word is ‘shuwb’, a verb meaning ‘to return’ or ‘to turn back’. It’s first use is in Genesis 3 v 19 where Adam was told that he will work hard until he returns to the ground and returns to dust. Similarly in Genesis 8 v 3 it describes the floodwaters turning back, and in Genesis 8 v 9, it refers to the raven that Noah sent out from the ark returning back to the ark. In I Kings 8 v 47 it is used with regard to Jews returning to and pleading with God, confessing their wayward and wicked behaviour. 

The near-equivalent New Testament Greek word is the verb ‘metanoeó’, from ‘metá’, which can mean ‘with’, ‘after’ or ‘among’; and ‘noiéō’, from a root word meaning ‘mind’ or ‘intellect’, and thus ‘noiéō’ is taken to mean ‘perceive’, ‘understand’, or ‘think’. As a result, ‘metanoeó’ means ‘to think and perceive with or afterwards’. It occurs 34 times in the New Testament. The Greek word is more differentiated than the Hebrew word, such that it does not precisely mean the same thing. In the New Testament, the word often translated into English as ‘repent’ is actually focussed on the ‘mind’ – on thinking and reasoning things through to a conclusion after something has been said or done. Unlike the Hebrew word it is not primarily focussed on behaviour, and in some of the next posts we will see that some of the texts clearly indicate this more specific focus on the mind. 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [2] What the Apostles did NOT teach

 The Apostles taught that Christians are called or summoned to engage in the process of living a godly life, a life set apart from the principles and values of the worldly arrangement. Before I look at how the Apostles encouraged Christians to put such a life into effect, it is important to note what they did not teach, because numerous errors have crept in to Christianity over the centuries. 

The Apostles did not -

Make appeals to the external commandments of divine Law, using them as a ‘spur’ to ‘goad’ Christians towards godliness and avoidance of sin. 

Encourage Christians to adopt an attitude of self-surrender, so as to ‘stop struggling and making the effort, and rather let go and let God do the work’. 

Make appeals to the feelings or emotions of Christians as a basis for their behaviour. 

Exhort Christians to seek transcendent or ecstatic experiences as a means of empowerment over sin. 

Encourage Christians to punish their own bodies in order to purge out sin.

Rather, the Apostles constantly appealed to the minds of Christians by presenting ‘spiritual’ knowledge – enlightened knowledge away from the Breath of God that in turn leads to underlying principles of speech and behaviour. ‘Outsiders’ or ‘unbelievers’ cannot, by their own ability away from their deep inner core, be persuaded of such knowledge and principles to the point of obedience. The Apostles encouraged Christians who were receiving enlightened knowledge to think this knowledge through to its logical conclusion, to use their ability to think, evaluate, comprehend and analyse. They exhorted Christians to apply this knowledge and its conclusions by means of engaging in enlightened mastery and ‘possession of their vessel’. Christians were to carry this illuminating knowledge from their hearts and minds across into their behaviour moment-by-moment, within the sphere of practical, beneficial love. The Apostles exhorted Christians to harness the wayward raw passions, desires and energies that are still inherent in their fleshly constitution, and to ‘walk around within the Breath’ and build up their allotted inheritance within the heavenly realm. They taught that when Christians persist in ungodly, worldly behaviour, they incur a degree of loss of their portion of the divine inheritance – not a loss of deliverance itself – but a loss of some of their portion of the treasure of the divine inheritance. 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [1] Introduction

 I want to understand the Apostle Paul’s approach to the principles of practical daily Christian living. Most particularly I want to see how he approached problems, errors and failings when it came to Christians living a godly life set apart from the values and principles of the world. The assembly at Corinth had its fair share of problems. Passionate arguments, divisions and schisms arose from out of spiritual ambition. One Christian was engaging in an outrageous sexual relationship that was shocking even by the worldly standards of ‘outsiders’ and bringing the assembly and the gospel into public disrepute. Christians were going to non-Christian lawyers to settle disputes between themselves. There were issues concerning marriage and the roles of males and females. Christian involvement with regard to other religions was also a cause for concern. There was an element of excessive liberty and permissiveness within the assembly. There were also concerns around the role of females with regard to authority within the assembly. Problems were evident with regard to attitudes towards the Lord’s Supper. Many in the assembly had a misplaced ambition when it came to divine favours or spiritual gifts. There was a degree of disorder in worship meetings. And last of all, some within the assembly were denying the rousing up from out of the dead.   

How did the Apostle deal with these matters? It is clear that he presented a foundation of spiritual knowledge - theology - as a basis for Christian behaviour. Sometimes he appealed to ‘what is written’ in the Hebrew Scriptures. Sometimes he pointed to historical examples concerning God’s chosen ethnic group, the Jews. Very occasionally he expressed his personal opinion. He used reason and logical arguments to come to conclusions and establish principles with regard to godly behaviour. He then made practical applications and exhortations in which he sometimes encouraged his Christian readers to likewise think things through for themselves. In the light of such enlightened knowledge, teaching and reasoning things through for themselves, he exhorted Christians to exercise self-control and to be unified in their perspective, behaving in a way that was consistent with what they came to understand as opposed to following their fleshly impulses. ‘Therefore do not let loss and self-forfeiture reign within your mortal body towards attentively listening and obeying under its eager desires’, (Romans 6 v 12). The impetus of a godly Christian life is away from worldly speech and behaviour that God disapproves of, and towards speech and behaviour that is clean and set apart from the world. So the question I am asking is this - in what particular and specific ways did Paul and the other Apostles encourage Christians towards this godly way of living?