Paul says that ‘…away and separate from the attentive thinking and supposition of the original formation, the unveiling of the sons of God is welcomed away from, and out of, eager waiting in full expectation. 20 For the empty original formation has begun and is continuing to be placed under, absolutely not willingly or voluntarily, but by means of the placing under on the basis of confident expectation 21 that even the original formation itself will be set free away from the enslavement, the decay and ruin, penetrating into the freedom, the honour and glory of the children of God’, (Romans 8 v 18 - 21).
In verse 20 Paul gives the reason why ‘the unveiling of the sons of God is welcomed away from, and out of, eager waiting in full expectation’. He once again uses the Greek word ‘ktisis’, which in the previous post I said means ‘original formation’. In terms of human beings, the word refers to their original arrangement or formation that they inherit - the sensuous, earthy, fleshly human constitution with its impulses and passions that as a result of Adam’s disobedience are opposed to God because of the fall into disobedience. This original formation is now described as ‘empty’ – as transient, aimless and lacking usefulness.
But that is by no means the end of the narrative. The context of this passage is that Paul is talking about Christians being judicially approved and made rightwise. With regard to Christians he tells us that ‘the empty original formation has begun and is continuing to be placed under’. He states this in the aorist tense – in other words this ‘placing under’ is something that has started in the past and is continuing at this present time and will continue into the future. The ‘original arrangement and formation’ – the natural human constitution of flesh and blood - is in a process of being ‘placed under’ at this present time. The Greek word is ‘hupotassó’, meaning ‘to appoint or arrange under’. I will explain ‘under what’ in the next post.
However, the Christian’s ‘empty original formation’ that lacks usefulness – their physical body of flesh and blood - is not willingly or voluntarily ‘being arranged under’ or ‘arranging itself under’. The Christian’s physical constitution per se, their ‘original formation’, is unresponsive to God and in fact, the energies and impulses inherent within the fabric of flesh are opposed to God. So the transient, aimless original formation has begun and is continuing ‘to be unwillingly arranged under’ ‘on the basis of confident expectation’ of something. This welcoming confident expectation is ‘away and separate from the attentive thinking and supposition of the original formation’ (verse 19). It is not arising from the empty original formation itself. It is not a welcome confident expectation that is ‘naturally emerging’ from the Christian’s flesh and blood. Rather, it arises separate and away from the attentive thinking and suppositions that arise from the empty original formation of our earthy constitution. It is something distinct and separate.
So the next question is, ‘Confident expectation of what?’ Paul tells us immediately in verse 21 – ‘confident expectation that even the original formation itself will be set free away from the enslavement, the decay and ruin, penetrating into the freedom, the honour and glory of the children of God’. The Christian’s welcome confident expectation is that ‘the original formation itself will be set free away from the enslavement, the decay and ruin’. Their confident expectation is with regard to a radical and fundamental change to the original formation itself, a change that will penetrate into ‘the freedom away from the enslavement, the decay and ruin, the honour and glory of the children of God’.
As Paul says elsewhere, the original formation of flesh and blood cannot inherit or even see the Kingdom of God. Christians are already existing as a new formation having been born again, but the process is not yet complete. But Christians possess confident expectation that their original formation, their inherited, fallen, fleshly constitution, will in the future, when redemption is made complete, be set free from its enslavement to self-forfeiture, decay and ruin. The Christian’s eager, confident expectation is that their physical body will be changed. ‘…we will all be changed within an indivisible moment in time, within the jerk of an eye, at the final trumpet. For the trumpet will sound and the dead will be aroused without decay, not perishable, and we will be made different’, (I Corinthians 15 v 52).
It is on the basis of this eager, welcome confident expectation that at this present time the empty original formation is being ‘placed under’, (verse 20b). ‘Because we are existing within the tent, we are groaning and weighed down on the basis that we do not wish to be stripped out of clothing, but to be clothed over so that ‘the subject to death’ be swallowed down by Life’, (II Corinthians 5 v 4). There is part of the incentive or motivation for Christians ‘putting to death the actions of the body’, (verse 13). This is quite a different process from the legalist’s proposal that Christians turn to the written codes of Covenant law and try to use them as a spur towards holiness.
