Galatians 6 v 11 – 16 - Paul’s concluding remarks

 ‘See what large letters I have written to you with my own hand. 12 As many as wish to have a good appearance within flesh, these are compelling you to be circumcised, but only in order that they are not pursued and persecuted for the cross of Jesus the anointed one. 13 Because not even the circumcised themselves are observing law, but they desire you to be circumcised in order that they may boast within your flesh. 14 But for me, may it never happen to be boasting if not within the cross of our Lord Jesus the anointed one, by means of which the worldly arrangement has been crucified to me, and I to the worldly order and arrangement. 15 Neither circumcision nor foreskin is anything – on the contrary, a new original formation. 16 And as many as will walk within and follow this principle, on this basis, and on the basis of the God of Israel, their peace and compassion’, (Galatians 6 v 11 – 16).

Paul obviously had someone else to actually write his letters, but here he writes this last section with his own hand, as if to emphasise his concluding remarks. He once again criticises the Judaizers who have come in to cause so much trouble. He says that those insisting on male Gentile Christians being circumcised wanted to look good within the flesh. They wanted to obtain a reputation for religiousness, like the hypocrites who ‘love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, so that they may be seen of men’ (Matthew 6 v 5). Appearing outwardly righteous in front of others, they wanted to be accounted in this way by them; and therefore they did all they could to be seen of them, and gain applause from them. They wanted by this means to keep in with their countrymen, the Jews, and to gain favour amongst them by seeming to win over proselytes to Covenant law.  

They were acting in this way in case they should suffer pursuit and persecution from fellow Jews for the cross. It is well known that the Jewish chief priests and elders were great persecutors of the disciples of Jesus, and began their persecution very early on. These Judaizers did not act from any true love for God. They escaped the bitterness that fellow Jews had against Christianity and the offence of the cross of the Messiah by making the Mosaic law a necessary preliminary for Christians. In fact, they were making Christian converts into Jewish proselytes. ‘Not even the circumcised themselves are observing law, but they desire you to be circumcised in order that they may boast within your flesh’. These Jews who were insisting on circumcision did not observe Covenant law themselves. Rather, they wanted to boast about how many Christians they had turned into Jewish proselytes. 

Paul concludes by saying that he does not want to boast about anything except the cross. By means of the cross ‘the worldly arrangement has been crucified to me, and I to the worldly order and arrangement’. Worldly values, methods and principles mean nothing to Paul and he regards the worldly arrangement as dying away so as to be superseded at the time of the harvest. (An event that he thought was quite imminent). 

His concluding remarks about circumcision? ‘Neither circumcision nor foreskin is anything – on the contrary, a new original formation’. What matters for Paul is being brought forth by God, or born again, and the Christian’s new formation or new self. ‘As many as will walk within and follow this principle, on this basis, and on the basis of the God of Israel, their peace and compassion’. 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [6] – Repentance [4 of 12]

 Jesus was critical of those who presumed that they were judicially approved in front of God. We can still hear this kind of sentiment today - ‘I have not been a bad person really – I have not murdered anyone or anything like that. I am sure that a loving God will understand and say that I tried my best, and that He will forgive my mistakes and welcome me into heaven’. 

But this is what Jesus actually says on this matter. After presenting the parable of the shepherd who rejoiced on finding his lost sheep, Jesus said, ‘I say to you that in the same way there will be joy within heaven on the basis of one sinner thinking and perceiving afterwards, than on the basis of ninety-nine upright and righteous, whosoever, absolutely not requiring to possess thinking and perceiving afterwards’, (Luke 15 v 7).  In other words such people, whoever they are, need to think again. Jesus presents a similar conclusion after his description of a woman who lost a coin, searched for it, and rejoiced at finding it. Jesus concluded by saying, ‘I say to you, in this way there is joy in front of the angel/messengers of God on the basis of one sinner thinking and perceiving afterwards’, (Luke 15 v 10). Once again this is a message to Jews. There is rejoicing in the heavenly realm when angels observe the beginning of a positive response to God when a Jew who has lost their way thinks afterwards and turns back to God. 

So what is it that people need to be presented with in order to be persuaded to the point of obedience? Do they need fine orators and clever, witty speeches? Do they need a preacher with personality and charisma? Do they need a slick outreach campaign with professional musicians and an attractive, entertaining presentation with all the razzmatazz? Do they need clever, educated proposals and arguments? In Luke’s gospel there is the illustration of a rich man who dies and finds himself unable to escape torment within the unseen realm. Some distance away he sees Abraham in a state of comfort, but there is a deep chasm that separates Abraham from the rich man such that the rich man cannot cross over to Abraham. So the rich man calls out and pleads to Abraham for someone to appear to his five brothers, to give them solemn evidence of the place of torment, so that they might avoid it. But Abraham replies, ‘“They possess Moses and the Prophets, they should hear and comprehend them.” 30 But the rich man said, “By no means father Abraham…’, in other words, there is no way that my brothers will listen to Moses and the Prophets. So the rich man makes an alternative proposal, ‘….but if one away from death travelled to them they will think and perceive afterwards.” 31 But Abraham said to him, “If they are not listening to Moses and Prophets they will not be persuaded, not even if one from out of death stands up”’, (Luke 16 v 29 – 31). The Apostle Paul presents this same principle in chapter 2 of his first letter to the Corinthians. The declaration of the gospel, the word of the cross, even when it is presented in a stumbling, hesitant way that lacks eloquence, is a sufficient means for the Breath of God to bring forth enlightened persuasion and thinking afterwards within those whom God has selected. 

Principles of living a set apart, godly life [1] Introduction

 I want to understand the Apostle Paul’s approach to the principles of practical daily Christian living. Most particularly I want to see how he approached problems, errors and failings when it came to Christians living a godly life set apart from the values and principles of the world. The assembly at Corinth had its fair share of problems. Passionate arguments, divisions and schisms arose from out of spiritual ambition. One Christian was engaging in an outrageous sexual relationship that was shocking even by the worldly standards of ‘outsiders’ and bringing the assembly and the gospel into public disrepute. Christians were going to non-Christian lawyers to settle disputes between themselves. There were issues concerning marriage and the roles of males and females. Christian involvement with regard to other religions was also a cause for concern. There was an element of excessive liberty and permissiveness within the assembly. There were also concerns around the role of females with regard to authority within the assembly. Problems were evident with regard to attitudes towards the Lord’s Supper. Many in the assembly had a misplaced ambition when it came to divine favours or spiritual gifts. There was a degree of disorder in worship meetings. And last of all, some within the assembly were denying the rousing up from out of the dead.   

How did the Apostle deal with these matters? It is clear that he presented a foundation of spiritual knowledge - theology - as a basis for Christian behaviour. Sometimes he appealed to ‘what is written’ in the Hebrew Scriptures. Sometimes he pointed to historical examples concerning God’s chosen ethnic group, the Jews. Very occasionally he expressed his personal opinion. He used reason and logical arguments to come to conclusions and establish principles with regard to godly behaviour. He then made practical applications and exhortations in which he sometimes encouraged his Christian readers to likewise think things through for themselves. In the light of such enlightened knowledge, teaching and reasoning things through for themselves, he exhorted Christians to exercise self-control and to be unified in their perspective, behaving in a way that was consistent with what they came to understand as opposed to following their fleshly impulses. ‘Therefore do not let loss and self-forfeiture reign within your mortal body towards attentively listening and obeying under its eager desires’, (Romans 6 v 12). The impetus of a godly Christian life is away from worldly speech and behaviour that God disapproves of, and towards speech and behaviour that is clean and set apart from the world. So the question I am asking is this - in what particular and specific ways did Paul and the other Apostles encourage Christians towards this godly way of living?