Side-tracked!

 Well I was planning to complete a study of the letter of James by now, and I did get to chapter four, but then I got side-tracked by a study/revision that proved to be a bigger and more absorbing project than I intended. Indeed, it will be months before this project - a new book (or two!) - will be complete. I am afraid I don't have the time to do both of these projects so the James study is temporarily shelved for now, and any posts are for the moment at least, restricted to news of progress.

New studies coming soon

I am now engaged in preparing new studies of the letters of James and I and II Peter. The first draft of translations of the Greek text are now complete, and I am halfway through commentating on James's letter. I want to continue writing the commentary a little more to get a good overview of the letter before starting to post. I expect to begin posting here somewhere between mid December 2025 and early January 2026.

Revised book - In the beginning - A commentary on the early chapters of Genesis

 

Are you struggling with the traditional interpretation of the Genesis creation story? 

Why is it that dinosaurs are not mentioned? Does Genesis present us with an accurate portrayal of the origins of humanity that stand up to scientific and historical evidence? What about talking snakes? And where did Cain’s wife come from? Did people like Adam really live for hundreds of years? Was the flood in Noah’s time a global event? 

Many aspects of the early chapters of Genesis have come to be regarded as fables or metaphors devised by primitive people to explain their origins. Yet the Apostle Paul obviously regarded Adam and Eve as real people who existed in the past. Was he wrong? 

‘In the beginning’ is a study that explores this early narrative from the opening verse of Genesis to the time of Abraham’s birth. It offers some radical, new, but coherent interpretations that nevertheless remain consistent with the text of Scripture. This study, originally written in 2020, has now been revised to remove some repetitive sections of text, amplify a few explanations and eliminate some grammatical errors. It is available from Amazon as a paperback book.

New book - A commentary on I Corinthians

 

The Corinthian Christian fellowship had its fair share of problems - division between the leaders as well as partisanship in the assembly, and one Christian was engaged in behaviour that was shocking even to outsiders and bringing the fellowship into disrepute. Some Christians were consulting non-Christian lawyers to settle their disputes, and ambition was causing division within the fellowship such that some Christians were being negated. There was also a degree of disorder when it came to celebrating the Lord’s Supper and to manifesting spiritual gifts. Some were even denying that resurrection existed.

In this verse-by-verse commentary, Rob Laynton explores how the Apostle approached these very practical problems. In the process he draws out principles for today’s Christians and their leaders as they seek to live a godly life day-by-day.

The study is available as a 400 page paperback from Amazon

Book - Against Christian Legalism

 

The recent posts that have been presented on this blog are also available in paperback book format. If, like me, you prefer to browse a book rather than scroll on a phone or computer, then this book is available to buy on Amazon.

From the very beginning of the Protestant Reformation, when it came to Christians living a clean, divinely approved life day-by-day - some Christian leaders directed Christians to ‘divine Law’ as a ‘spur’ to being set-apart from the values and principles of the world.   

This became an ‘orthodox’ approach for many Protestant Christians, and a legacy of ‘Christian legalism’ that has come down to some Evangelical Christians today. Christian legalists divide Covenant law into ‘Ceremonial law’ – fulfilled in the Messiah, and ‘Moral law’ – that remains in force. Is a Christian stealing? Then Christian legalists direct them to the ‘Moral law’, like the Ten Commandments, which say ‘You shall not steal’, so as to drive such a Christian to the Lord in repentance. Christian legalists argue that to challenge this procedure is to challenge the word of God itself, to risk engaging in permissive ungodliness and excessive freedom, and they even cast doubt on the persistent challenger’s faith and loyalty to God. 

But did the Apostles actually teach this approach? Is this how they exhorted Christians to live a godly life day-by-day? Remaining faithful to Scripture, this study by Rob Laynton explores some key New Testament passages that challenge ‘Christian legalism’, so as to set out the principles of holiness that the Apostles taught.

 

I Timothy 1 v 19b – 20 - Excommunication [2]

 In Corinthians Paul says, ‘…hand over one from of this sort to close beside Satan, penetrating towards the aim of the ruination of the flesh in order that the breath is being delivered to safety within the Day of the Lord’ (I Corinthians 5 v 5). Paul places his focus on the Day of the Lord which is associated with the fair Judgement of God by means of His Messiah, when secret matters of the heart and things done in darkness will be revealed. For the Apostle the Day of the Lord is in many ways the time of completion and fulfilment for Christians. It is the time of rousing up from out of the dead, standing up again, full redemption and the allotment of divine rewards and inheritance to Christians as sons and heirs in God’s house. 

 

The ‘breath’ being delivered is often interpreted by commentators to refer our ‘soul’, by which they tend to mean an immortal incorporeal ‘true self’ sheathed by our physical body. That’s according to orthodox Christian tradition anyway. I am proposing that our ‘breath’ is our inner ‘direction and movement of energy’, related to life, sensitivity and responsiveness to God. 

I suggest that if Christians are regarded and treated as an ‘outsider’ as a result of their excommunication, then this leads them to ‘necessary proportionate recompense of their wandering off course’ (Romans 1 v 27b). This recompense, this proportional and appropriate payment for wandering off course, may take a number of forms. Such an individual may become materially wealthy and/or successful – but lose their breath – their energy and sensitivity to the Lord and thus suffer loss within the Day of the Lord. Or they may suffer illness, or loss of their favourable situation or reputation, or experience adversity, regret, a sense of abandonment or isolation, or any number of such things. By experiencing such adverse circumstances the aim is that they come to see that they have turned to ‘broken cisterns’ instead of the ‘water of life’. The hope is that as a result they may turn back in repentance towards obedient trust in and sensitive responsiveness to God and His Messiah, thus delivering their breath now, at this present time, and thus receiving the beneficial future consequences of this within the Day of the Lord.

There we are, Paul is quite consistent. He was no legalist, nor was he a permissive liberal. Nor was he anti-law in the sense of opposing or negating the principles and aims of divine law. Christians are placed under the free gift of God by means of the Messiah, who fulfils the requirements of divine law on their behalf and pays the price required by law for their self-forfeiture. Paul was therefore against Christians referring to the external written codes of Levitical law as a means of godliness, arguing that Christians are not under Levitical law, or any written system of law for that matter. Rather, Christians have been transferred into a royal priesthood of the order of Melchizedek with Jesus the Messiah as their High Priest. The principles of divine law are written in the Christian’s deep inner core, and borne witness to by the indwelling Breath. So Christians are exhorted to walk around day-by-day within the sphere of the Breath. In other words, in this respect, the locus of the dynamic of the Christian life is within, rather than by reference to and imposition of external written codes. The focus is on union with the Messiah as their Lord and Saviour, and on the Breath enlightening and illuminating the Christian’s perception of unseen realities. It is on Christians co-working with God by exercising their mind, such that they reason things through to their proper conclusion. It is on carrying these enlightened principles and conclusions across from within into their speech and behaviour in practical beneficial love, especially to fellow Christians, so that they speak and behave consistently with their calling, and bring forth the primary Fruit of the Breath. In the process they are being transformed into the image of the Messiah as the Breath opposes the impulses of the Christian’s fleshly constitution. 

I Timothy 1 v 19b – 20 - Professing Christians, Serious wayward behaviour and Excommunication [1]

 Because they were persistently blaspheming, ‘Hymenaeus and Alexander, [were] yielded up to Satan, the adversarial accuser, in order that they may be trained not to blaspheme,’ (I Timothy 1 v 19b – 20). A similar phrase is used in Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians. ‘Delivering to Satan’ conveys the same idea as when Jesus said, “If he is continuing to disregard the fellowship [then] he is to you just like the ‘outsider’ and [like] the one who gathers taxes from the Jews for ‘outsiders’”. In other words he or she is serving the opposition. At Corinth the Christian leaders and assembly were to regard the man who was excommunicated as separated away from them. As cut off from the Kingdom of God, like foreskin is cut off in circumcision, as belonging within the orderly arrangement of the world under the delegated authority of Satan. To exclude someone from the Kingdom of God is by default to place him or her into the dominion of Satan.

Paul says that the purpose or aim in handing Hymenaeus and Alexander over to Satan was that they will be trained, educated and disciplined not to blaspheme. We are not to interpret Paul’s action as a punishment, or as an attempt to make them pay off the debt that their improper speech incurred. Rather it is about training and education towards godliness and cleanliness. And about the maintenance of the cleanliness of the assembly and reverence for God and the gospel. 

In Corinth the aim was to bring the excommunicated man’s physical body and its fleshly raw passions to ruination and loss. He was not being handed over for the destruction of his body, or to die. Rather he was being handed over for the ruination of his flesh. For bringing about the end result of his fleshly passions – the proportionate recompense within himself - so that he might be humbled and brought back to the path of godly cleanliness and be recalled to virtue by means of his suffering, discomfort and loss. The aim was that this man’s mind and body would be shaken, buffeted and afflicted such that he would be brought to his senses regarding his gross sexual behaviour, and then repent of it by making humble acknowledgment of it and turning away from it. 

Paul teaches that this affliction and torment, this ruination of the flesh, is the work of Satan. He presents Satan as the author of bodily diseases such that even of himself, Paul says that ‘in order to keep me from becoming conceited I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me’, (II Corinthians 12 v 7). Similarly, we also have this statement regarding Jesus healing on the Sabbath: ‘a woman was there whom a breath had crippled for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all.... [Jesus said] “Shouldn’t this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free?”’ (Luke 13 v 11, 16).

The divinely disapproved-of and God-opposing speech, attitudes and behaviours of both the man in Corinth and of Hymenaeus and Alexander, were extremely unacceptable. They were opposed to God and public. Their behaviours were not ‘hidden away out of sight’ but were clearly known about and heard both within the Christian assemblies and by ‘outsiders’. More than this, these three men, who declared that they were Christians, were disregarding the assembly and in many ways serving the purposes of those were opposed to God. For these reasons they had to be removed from the fellowship, they had to be dis-identified with and separated away from the assembly in order to protect the honour of God and the reputation of the fellowship. But the aim was that they might turn around and away from such speech and behaviours.

I Timothy 1 v 18, 19 - Elders and Christians bringing the gospel into disrepute

 In verse 15 Paul stated the good news of the Messiah very succinctly. In verses 3 – 7 he stated that some were missing the mark with regard to this good news or gospel. Some were becoming absorbed in myths, others in endless genealogical details, and others wanted to be experts in Covenant law. Paul explained that divine is law is good but that it is not intended for the righteous. It is for the unrighteous and lawless. Paul agrees that before he became a Christian he was very lawless. He persecuted and oppressed Jews who were embracing Christianity. But he says that he acted in ignorance and despite his behaviour, God’s mercy through His anointed son, Jesus, super-abounded.

I have stayed with Paul’s account to Timothy because Paul now moves on to two Christians who had fallen into behaviour that also openly opposed the gospel and was bringing it into disrepute. How did the Apostle deal with these two Christians? Did he quote Levitical law and the Ten Commandments to them? That is what legalists would do. Let’s see what Paul did in the next three verses. 

‘I place alongside this injunction to you Timothy my child, down from the prophecies going before you, that you serve as a soldier within them, the good military service. 19 possessing entrustment and a good conscience', (I Timothy 1 v 18, 19a). First of all, Paul gives an exhortation to Timothy who is a ruling elder in this assembly. This exhortation was either based either on some earlier assessments by fellow Christians in relation to Timothy, or (more probably) on the basis of some revelations that Paul, or some other believers had received concerning Timothy. Paul tells Timothy to serve as a good soldier of the Messiah within the Ephesian assembly, particularly within their leaders. He encourages Timothy to hold on to faith and a good conscience. This leads Paul to make a statement about some of these leaders and especially about two wayward Christians named Hymenaeus and Alexander. 

Paul says that ‘some have pushed away, causing a shipwreck around entrustment', (I Timothy 1 v 19b). They have pushed away from the basic teaching of the gospel that Paul had announced to the Ephesians, as we have just seen. Hymenaeus and Alexander were two Christians who had a tendency to blaspheme – to defame, revile, to speak evil and irreverently. In other words, they were acting like ‘outsiders’ and bringing disrepute upon the gospel, God and Jesus. All of these people were causing a shipwreck around entrusting and being persuaded of the Messiah. They were creating opposition and resistance to the gospel. Thus Paul begins by exhorting Timothy not to be like them, but rather to ‘serve like a soldier holding on to faith and a good conscience’.

So what did Paul do with regard to Hymenaeus and Alexander? Did he refer them to Covenant law? No, although the principle and aim of Covenant law no doubt informed his decision. Christians are not summoned by God to then behave in a way that causes resistance to the gospel. Such behaviour is not down from the Breath of God. Christians ‘walking within the Breath’ do not regularly and persistently ‘rubbish’ God, Jesus or the gospel. Such speech and behaviour brings the gospel and the assembly into negative criticism and leads ‘outsiders’ into dismissal of the gospel. Paul’s decision was that since they were behaving like ‘outsiders’, opposing the gospel and bringing God and His Messiah into disrepute, he ‘handed them over to Satan’. They were no longer acknowledged as being associated with the Ephesian assembly. Help, support and fellowship was withdrawn from them and they were ‘back in the worldly arrangement’.

I Timothy 1 v 15 - 17 - The good news or gospel

 Paul brings his previous excessive opposition together with God’s free gift ‘Faithful the saying and deserving all acceptance, that Jesus Messiah came into the orderly arrangement to save and make whole self-forfeiters, of whom I am foremost’. (I Timothy 1 v 15). Paul by no means denies his previous behaviour but rather refers to his excessive opposition so as to reinforce the superabundant mercy of God in sending His only begotten son to deliver one who had such strong opposition. 

So what is the end result? ‘But by this means I was shown mercy, in order that within me, the foremost [self-forfeiter], Jesus Messiah might show forth absolutely all patience, as a pattern for those about to be believing on the basis of him, penetrating into perpetual life. 17 And to the King of the ages, incorruptible, invisible, solitary God, honour and praiseworthiness penetrating into the ages of the ages. Amen.' (I Timothy 1 v 16, 17). In effect, Paul says, ‘If God has shown mercy to me, who was such a prominent self-forfeiter opposing the gospel, then this is a pattern for those who are about to entrust Jesus. If I have been delivered from condemnation, then this is an encouragement to those who have not entered into such a degree of opposition, it means that they will also be delivered by entrustment in the Messiah'. Paul then breaks out into praise to God as King of the ages and seasons. 

I Timothy 1 v 12 – 14 - Self-forfeiture before being brought forth by God

Paul anticipates a potential objection. Didn’t he once persecute Christians? Didn’t he once engage in a mission to hunt down Hebrew Christians to force them to turn back to Judaism? Didn’t he stand by as an observer who approved of Stephen being stoned to death? Isn’t he like one of the very people who he has just being describing – one strongly opposed to Christian teaching? So he goes on to say, ‘I have thankfulness for the [one] having strengthened me, Jesus the Messiah, our Lord, that he led me faithfully, having placed me into service, 13 formerly being a blasphemer, a persecutor and damaging insulter’. (I Timothy 1 v 12 – 13a). Paul admits that this is exactly what he was like. But then he adds, ‘But I was shown mercy, because being ignorant I constructed within lack of faith, 14 and the graciousness of our Lord exceedingly abounded, in company with entrustment and beneficial love within the Messiah, Jesus’, (I Timothy 1 v 13b – 14). In effect, one of the things he is saying is that Christians do not act in the kind of ways that he has just been describing. He says, ‘Yes, its is true. I did act in that way, as persecutor and blasphemer, but I was acting in ignorance, within lack of knowledge and perception, and what I was doing was in the sphere of lack of entrustment and persuasion. This was how I was before I became a Christian.’ He then says that despite his excessive opposition, the free gift and mercy of God and His Messiah ‘exceedingly abounded’ – it was superabundant, it went beyond his self-forfeiture and was super-plentiful. God’s graciousness came in company with persuasion and entrustment – faith – and practical beneficial love within God’s anointed the Messiah.  

I Timothy 1 v 9c – 11 - The principles and aims of divine law

 The law is ‘for those threshing fathers, and threshing mothers, for murderers of man, 10 male prostitutes, men in bed with another man, those bringing men to his feet, liars, perjurers or false witnesses’, (I Timothy 1 v 9c – 10a). 

Some commentators propose that Paul is indeed following the Ten Commandments here in verses 9 - 11. But Paul is not quoting divine law or the Ten Commandments. What we need to note is this, the law is good and its moral principles and aims remain in place. Jesus does not introduce permissive licentiousness but a transfer of the principles and aims of divine law away from external written codes to these principles being written on the Christian’s heart, borne witness to by the Breath of God and union with the Messiah. Thus Paul does not make direct reference to the external written codes of the Ten Commandments when it comes to the righteous – Christians. Law, and divine law especially, is for those who are not righteous, for the type of individual who has deliberate irreverence, who is an ill-user of their father and mother. The Greek word means to ‘thresh’. ‘Thresh’ literally means to separate the edible grain from the straw or husks of a harvested plant, typically by beating, hence physical abuse, beating or hitting of parents. Law is for murderers, those who dominate other people and bring them under their feet, and deceitful liars.

Indeed, divine law is for ‘anyone else if opposing the healthy teaching 11 down from the good news of the honour and praiseworthiness of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted’, (I Timothy 1 v 10b – 11). There we have the general principle with regard to divine law. 

Divine law is for anyone setting him or herself in full opposition to, as irreconcilable to, or contrary to and adversarial to healthy teaching down from the gospel

I Timothy 1 v 9a - Christian legalist objections

 '....law is not lying outstretched for the equitable and righteous’, (I Timothy 1 v 9a). 

‘Aha!’ says the legalist, ‘What the Apostle means is that Christians are not under the ‘Ceremonial Law’. But Christians do remain under the ‘Moral Law’ such as the Ten Commandments’. I have argued that this division into two different aspects or facets of divine law is not entirely incorrect, but if pressed too far it negates the unity of Covenant law as a comprehensive integrated whole, a unified arrangement. But in any case, it is very clear from what follows that Paul is not talking about the Ceremonial aspects of divine law but its Moral aspects, because he goes on to talk about murderers, liars and prostitutes who clearly come under the Moral aspects or facets of divine law.

‘Ah! But,’ says the legalist, ‘It is true that Christians are indeed ultimately acquitted as judicially approved within the Messiah because of their union in him. But at the moment, even though the Breath of God is dwelling in their deepest inner core, Christians do not always walk around within the Breath, they do not always follow the leading of the Breath. They don’t always think things through to a correct conclusion and then act appropriately and consistently. Sometimes they are overtaken by fleshly impulses and that is when they need to be directed to divine law in order to drive them to the Messiah seeking forgiveness’. 

‘By no means’, says Paul. ‘For Christians, the reference point is no longer the external codes written in stone, instead their locus is the Messiah, and the principles of law are written on their hearts - the Ground of their thoughts, faculty of choice and affections. The Messiah fulfils the requirements of the law on their behalf, he has paid the price for their self-forfeiture, and as they entrust the Messiah, their self-forfeiture is removed as far as the east is from the west. As they perceive the practical, beneficial, love of the Messiah shown to them, and as they emulate it by carrying it across into their speech and behaviour, they bring forth the Fruit of the Breath. In this way the Messiah is made complete and they are being changed into his image. The dynamic is from within, it is not on the basis of the imposition of external written codes. This is the dynamic of the New Covenant of the blood of the Messiah, and the new royal priesthood into which Christians have been placed. Christians are not under the authority of external written codes of Levitical law, but under the free gift of God by means of His only begotten son.  

Law is for the unrighteous

That is the basic principle when it comes to using law legitimately. And if we are in any doubt, Paul lists the type of individual that he has in mind. Law is not for the righteous ‘but for the lawless and those not subject to rule, for those without reverence, self-forfeiting, for those without reverence or regard for what should be set apart, crossing the threshold, gaining improper entrance’, (I Timothy 1 v 9b). Law is for those without law, for the unruly and insubordinate, and divine law is for those without respect, self-forfeiting in their contempt for that which should be set apart and clean. The word usually translated into English as ‘profane’ means ‘crossing the threshold, gaining improper entrance’. In literal terms it is like a brutish individual entering a set-apart place of godly devotion without having any respect or reverence. Paul goes on to explain in a little more detail. 

The law is ‘for those threshing fathers, and threshing mothers, for murderers of man, 10 male prostitutes, men in bed with another man, those bringing men to his feet, liars, perjurers or false witnesses’, (I Timothy 1 v 9c – 10a). 

I Timothy 1 v 8, 9a - Law is good, but not set out for the righteous

 ‘Now we appreciate that the law is good, provided someone is making use of it lawfully’, (I Timothy 1 v 8). Paul makes a similar statement to the one recorded in chapter seven of his letter to the Romans. He counters any idea that he is suggesting that divine law is bad in and of itself. Not at all, the law is good. But he adds a qualification. Divine law is good ‘provided someone is making use of it lawfully’. He says that the problem is that good divine law can be made use of unlawfully, it can be used in a way that is not according to the rules. It can be used in inappropriate circumstances, and he goes on to explain what he means.

‘Appreciating this, that law is not lying outstretched for the equitable and righteous’, (I Timothy 1 v 9a). He states an important principle that Christians have to appreciate with regard law in general. Law is not set out for the righteous, for the morally upright. Now we have understand what Paul is saying here. Paul is making one of his general statements, stating a general principle. Law – any law, civil law, religious law and so on – is not laid out for the righteous – for the innocent, morally upright or judicially approved. The context in which Paul makes this statement is that of Sinai Covenant law and Christians. Christians are righteous, not because of their own speech and labours towards godly behaviour, but because they are placed in union with the Messiah who fulfils all the requirements of Covenant law on their behalf. Christians are not placed under the written codes of Covenant law but under God’s free gift, they are not placed under the Levitical system but into a royal priesthood. 

I Timothy 1 v 6, 7 Missing the mark and law

 ‘Which some, having missed the mark, have turned away into empty talk, 7 wishing to be teachers of the law, not exercising their minds neither to understand what they are saying nor around which they emphatically assert’, (I Timothy 1 v 6, 7). 

Already, some of the teachers in the Ephesian assembly had missed the mark. They had turned away from the essence of the gospel message into unprofitable ‘empty talk’, into babbling. They desired to be teachers of Covenant law. Today, Christian legalists do not usually go this far. Although insisting on using divine law as a ‘spur’ to urge wayward Christians to turn back to the Messiah, Christian legalists do not usually become teachers, experts or consultants specialising in Covenant or Levitical law. Rather, they tend to constantly refer to the ‘Moral law’ and use ‘proof texts’ to ‘prod’ wayward Christians to turn to the Messiah in repentance. In public prayers they often talk about how Christians have fallen short of the standards and ideals of God’s ‘Moral law’, and about how unworthy Christians are in their day-to-day lives. If someone is persuaded of the importance and relevance of divine law to living a godly life, then becoming a teacher of law is a logical and consistent step to take, since they regard the law as being essential to godliness. But Paul objects to such reasoning and says that those wishing to be teachers of the law were ‘not exercising their minds’. There it is again, Paul’s emphasis on the Christian’s mind such that they think and reason things through to a conclusion in the light of the gospel. Paul says that those Christian teachers wishing to be teachers of the law are not making the effort to use their minds in order to come to the right conclusion. Furthermore, these Ephesian teachers were emphatically asserting their opinions. They were making bold, confident statements about the law as they sought to impose Levitical law on Christians at Ephesus. But Paul says that they don’t understand what they are saying. He goes on to explain what he means.

I Timothy 1 v 3 – 5 - Christian teachers missing the mark

 Paul makes reference to law in his first letter to Timothy. At the start of his letter Paul reminds Timothy of the instructions that he had given to him before Paul left for a journey to Macedonia.

‘Just as I was travelling to Macedonia, I called you near to remain in place in Ephesus so that you might give instruction from close beside to any one not to teach differently. 4 Nor to hold their mind towards fables and endless genealogies which hold near searching questions and disputes, rather than administration of God’s household which is within entrustment’, (I Timothy 1 v 3 – 4).

Paul and Timothy were both at Ephesus and as Paul was about to make a journey to Macedonia he had some concerns about the teachers in the Ephesian assembly, so he called Timothy close beside. He instructed him to remain in Ephesus because he was concerned that some in the Ephesian assembly were beginning to teach ideas and principles that were contrary to, or hindering the good news that Paul had announced to the Ephesians. The problem was similar to what Paul had faced with the Galatians – some of the Ephesian teachers were drifting away from the gospel. So he called Timothy aside and instructed him not to allow any one to teach differently from the teaching Paul had already declared. Some in the Ephesian assembly were allowing themselves to be ‘side-tracked’, to be ‘knocked off course’ because they were paying attention to myths and fables. There were many such false stories circling in society and some of these Christian teachers were paying too much attention to them in their teaching. Other Christian teachers were focussing their minds on endless genealogies, going into deep examination of them and engaging in the different opinions and disputes that arose from them. The problem was that such interests were drawing attention away from the administration of God’s household, of Christians, which does not reside in such disputes, but within faith. 

‘But the aim of the instruction is practical benevolent love from out of a clean heart, good conscience and sincere entrustment’, (I Timothy 1 v 5). Paul was not trying to be negatively critical, nor was he being divisive or merely protecting his own opinions. Rather, his aim in giving this instruction to Timothy was that the Ephesian Christians would mature into practical benevolent love from out of a deep inner core that was clean, and had a good conscience and sincere persuasion and entrustment. His concern was that some were already missing the mark. 

Romans 6 – 8 and Galatians – The case against Christian legalism

 I have presented these posts on Romans 6 - 8 and Galatians because I wanted to look at how the Apostle Paul exhorted Christians to live a godly life day-by-day. It soon became clear that Paul was no advocate of Christian legalism. Although he may have the ultimate aims and purposes of Divine law in mind – righteousness and cleanliness - he does not refer Christians to Covenant law as a means of living a godly life, just the opposite in fact. He argues that the law reveals our self-forfeiture and that the fleshly impulses within the Christian’s physical body take hold of the law and use it’s written codes as a springboard to bring themselves to completion in speech and behaviour. The law is good – it is our flesh that is the problem. Thus there is nothing good in our flesh and he calls our physical body ‘a body of death’ from which Christians will ultimately be released. Legalism leads to ‘deadness’, to criticism and judgement of other Christians, and potentially to a denial of the gospel. It leads to discouragement and a sense of failure.

Paul argues that we cannot deliver ourselves from divine judicial condemnation. Salvation is a free gift of God from start to finish. Whilst we are helpless God brings forth those He has selected by means of the Messiah and the set-apart Breath. As part of this process, the Christian’s ‘old formation’ or ‘old self’ or ‘natural earthy, sensuous self’ is crucified with the Messiah and they become a ‘new formation’ or ‘new self’, which Christians are encouraged to ‘put on’ or clothe themselves with. Possessing the indwelling of the set-apart Breath they are exhorted to walk around within the sphere of Breath. Paul’s emphasis is on Christians using their enlightened and illuminated mind that is enabled to perceive and embrace unseen realities, to reason things through to their proper conclusion. In other words he uses theological teaching. Then he says, exercise enlightened self-control and live life day-by-day in a way that is consistent with God’s calling and their enlightened understanding. The locus or ‘pivot’ of action is away from external written codes and towards the leading of the set-apart Breath. 

Paul is quite consistent when it comes to practical matters of living a godly life day-by-day. So, for example, if we were to look at Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, we would see that it is a letter of two halves. The first half, chapters 1 – 3, is about God’s glorious free gift of deliverance by means of Jesus. The second half is about what this means in practice. If you read chapters 4 - 6 through for yourself you find no appeals to Covenant law. Rather you find appeals to imitate and emulate the love of the Messiah, and to reflect different aspects of the relationship that the Messiah has with those whom God has selected. 

But I don’t want to spend time on these chapters because instead I now want to turn to chapter 1 of Paul’s first letter to Timothy, because once gain Paul looks at Christians who miss the mark because they want to become teachers of law.  

Galatians 6 v 11 – 16 - Paul’s concluding remarks

 ‘See what large letters I have written to you with my own hand. 12 As many as wish to have a good appearance within flesh, these are compelling you to be circumcised, but only in order that they are not pursued and persecuted for the cross of Jesus the anointed one. 13 Because not even the circumcised themselves are observing law, but they desire you to be circumcised in order that they may boast within your flesh. 14 But for me, may it never happen to be boasting if not within the cross of our Lord Jesus the anointed one, by means of which the worldly arrangement has been crucified to me, and I to the worldly order and arrangement. 15 Neither circumcision nor foreskin is anything – on the contrary, a new original formation. 16 And as many as will walk within and follow this principle, on this basis, and on the basis of the God of Israel, their peace and compassion’, (Galatians 6 v 11 – 16).

Paul obviously had someone else to actually write his letters, but here he writes this last section with his own hand, as if to emphasise his concluding remarks. He once again criticises the Judaizers who have come in to cause so much trouble. He says that those insisting on male Gentile Christians being circumcised wanted to look good within the flesh. They wanted to obtain a reputation for religiousness, like the hypocrites who ‘love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, so that they may be seen of men’ (Matthew 6 v 5). Appearing outwardly righteous in front of others, they wanted to be accounted in this way by them; and therefore they did all they could to be seen of them, and gain applause from them. They wanted by this means to keep in with their countrymen, the Jews, and to gain favour amongst them by seeming to win over proselytes to Covenant law.  

They were acting in this way in case they should suffer pursuit and persecution from fellow Jews for the cross. It is well known that the Jewish chief priests and elders were great persecutors of the disciples of Jesus, and began their persecution very early on. These Judaizers did not act from any true love for God. They escaped the bitterness that fellow Jews had against Christianity and the offence of the cross of the Messiah by making the Mosaic law a necessary preliminary for Christians. In fact, they were making Christian converts into Jewish proselytes. ‘Not even the circumcised themselves are observing law, but they desire you to be circumcised in order that they may boast within your flesh’. These Jews who were insisting on circumcision did not observe Covenant law themselves. Rather, they wanted to boast about how many Christians they had turned into Jewish proselytes. 

Paul concludes by saying that he does not want to boast about anything except the cross. By means of the cross ‘the worldly arrangement has been crucified to me, and I to the worldly order and arrangement’. Worldly values, methods and principles mean nothing to Paul and he regards the worldly arrangement as dying away so as to be superseded at the time of the harvest. (An event that he thought was quite imminent). 

His concluding remarks about circumcision? ‘Neither circumcision nor foreskin is anything – on the contrary, a new original formation’. What matters for Paul is being brought forth by God, or born again, and the Christian’s new formation or new self. ‘As many as will walk within and follow this principle, on this basis, and on the basis of the God of Israel, their peace and compassion’. 

Galatians 6 v 9, 10 - An apportioned share of the divine inheritance

 ‘And we should not grow weary in doing good, because not growing faint, in our season we will reap a harvest. 10 So then, in the manner that we have opportunity, we should be working good toward all, and especially toward those belonging to the family of faith’, (Galatians 6 v 9, 10). 

Sometimes, teaching the word faithfully and having practical beneficial love towards fellow Christians can seem to be a laborious and unrewarding endeavour. It can make us feel weary and lacking in motivation. Thus Paul encourages Christians not to grow weary in doing good. The Christian’s deliverance away from divine judicial condemnation by means of the Messiah and the set-apart Breath is given as a free gift as a result of God’s promise, a promise that He has sworn on oath on His own name. No one will snatch those who have been given to him from out of the Messiah’s hand. As Paul declares in Romans 8, no one and nothing can separate us away from the love of God. 

But for Christians, there is a prize to obtained and a harvest to reap. If Christians persist in wayward behaviour or become lazy, they will suffer ruin and loss. They will not lose their deliverance, but they will reap a smaller harvest. The ‘harvest’ is their allotted portion of the divine inheritance. It is his obtaining of the ‘harvest’ that is Paul’s motivation for persisting steadfastly in doing good. ‘…because not growing faint, in our season we will reap a harvest’. In our season, when the harvest comes, which will be at the advent of the Millennium Reign and the first rousing up from out of the dead so as to meet the Messiah in the air and enter into the unseen heavenly realms.

‘So then, in the manner that we have opportunity, we should be working good toward all’. Christians are not summoned to be antagonistic towards unbelievers, nor to negate them. Christians live in a world in which the majority of people are unbelievers. Christians are like wheat growing among weeds and wheat-like plants. So, while God continues life-breath to us and the season of sowing lasts, Christians are encouraged to live their lives as peaceably as they can. To be good marriage partners, family members, neighbours, employers, employees and work colleagues. But this is especially case when it comes to their relationships with fellow Christians, bearing in mind the primary injunction of the Messiah to show practical, beneficial love to one another.  

Galatians 6 v 6 – 8 - Sharing teaching

 ‘Now let the one being taught within the word, share the teaching within all goodness, 7 not leading astray. God is absolutely not ridiculed, because whatever a man is sowing, this also he will harvest. 8 Because sowing towards his flesh, from the flesh he will reap decay from within. But sowing towards the Breath, away from the Breath he will reap perpetual life’, (Galatians 6 v 6 – 8).

The Judaizers had come in to the Galatian assemblies with teaching. They were assertively teaching, instructing and exhorting that Christians had to follow Sinai Covenant law as the means of obtaining and maintaining divine judicial approval. So Paul goes ‘back to basics’ and says that Christians who have been taught within the word and who are sharing teaching should do so ‘within all goodness, not leading astray’. Such an individual should share the teaching honestly and faithfully. They should not twist the teaching in order to gain a good reputation, or to gain the advantages of status, material wealth or comfort.

Paul says, ‘Make no mistake. God is not ridiculed’. Why? ‘Because whatever a man is sowing, this also he will harvest’. Those who teach using malicious, deceitful motives are described as ‘sowing towards their flesh’, and the result of this is that  ‘from the flesh he will reap decay from within’. Elsewhere Paul describes the physical body and a ‘body of death’. This is because the impulses and raw passions inherent in our flesh are in opposition to God, and following these impulses – such as twisting the gospel message to obtain a good reputation – leads to withering away, to insensitivity and unresponsiveness to God and ultimately to divine disapproval and judicial condemnation. 

This is contrasted with the teacher who shares the word and the teaching accurately and faithfully. ‘… sowing towards the Breath, away from the Breath he will reap perpetual life’. The opposite of ruin, loss, withering away and death is ‘life’ – abundant life, life with a capital ‘L’, perpetual life. 

Galatians 6 v 3 – 5 – Restoring fellow Christians - Personal accountability, not self-superiority compared with others

 ‘For if someone is thinking they are someone, being nothing he is deluding himself. 4 But each one be testing his own work and action, and at that time he will hold the ground of boasting only towards himself, and absolutely not towards another, 5 for each one will bear his own burden’, (Galatians 6 v 3 - 5).

One of the dangers when Christians help to restore others is that they may see themselves as ‘superior’, as ‘rising above’ the wayward self-forfeiture that other Christians have fallen into. But ‘if someone is thinking they are someone, being nothing he is deluding himself’. No Christian is immune from wayward behaviour or from the impulses of their own flesh. No Christian is able to take the role of ‘superior judge’ over other Christians. Rather than criticising the behaviour of fellow Christians, the principle is that ‘each one be testing his own work and action, and at that time he will hold the ground of boasting only towards himself, and absolutely not towards another, 5 for each one will bear his own burden’.

Within the context of the situation that Paul has been writing about – Judaizers insisting that male Gentile Christians be circumcised in agreement with Covenant law – I suggest that Paul is primarily referring to the view that these Jews had of themselves. They thought that they had cause for self-praise arising from their self-righteous comparison of themselves with others, (Galatians 2 v 12, 13; and verses 12 and 13 below). No, says Paul. If you are about the business of adjusting and restoring fellow Christians, then don’t fall into the trap that these Judaizers have fallen into of being self-righteous and over-assertive, causing people to shrink back in fear. Rather, let a Christian judge their own work, not by comparing themselves with others, but by the ideal standard of the Messiah, then they will see what their work is worth and how much they have to boast of. Each individual will be judged by their own actions and not by any fancied superiority or inferiority to others. They will not be able to excuse themselves by drawing attention to their neighbour’s weaknesses.

In verse 2 Christians are exhorted to ‘bear the burdens’ of others in the sense of sympathising and being of practical assistance to them in their troubles. Here Christians are told that they must ‘bear their own load’ in the sense that they must answer directly to God for their own actions. Their responsibility cannot be shifted on to others. Each will bear their own ‘load’. The Greek word is different from that in verse 2. Here, self-examination will make an individual consider that he has enough to do with their own load of self-forfeiture, without comparing themselves boastfully with their neighbour.