Galatians 3 v 1 – 4 - The law, flesh and the Breath

 ‘Oh! Thoughtless Galatians. Who has fascinated you not to be persuaded of the truth, that mind’s eyes down, Jesus His Anointed was announced having been impaled on the cross? 2 I am only wishing to learn this away from you – Did you receive the Breath [Pneuma] from out of law-works, or from out of faithful hearing? 3 So are you not thinking and understanding? Having begun in Breath are you being made complete at this present time within flesh? 4 Have you experienced so much without basis, if indeed also without basis?’ (Galatians 3 v 1 – 4).

As I said earlier, Paul does not mince his words. He chastises the Hebrew Christians who were turning back to observing the written codes of Covenant law, and he says that they are not thinking. They seemed to initially embrace the gospel but Paul says that the gospel was announced to them and their ‘mind’s eye’, their perception and thoughtful insight, was ‘down’. ‘Who has distracted you’, says Paul, ‘Who has occupied your mind away from the gospel? I just want to know one thing, did you receive the Breath from out of your efforts and energies that you put into observing the written codes of divine law, or did you receive the Breath from out of hearing the gospel and being persuaded to the point of obedience?’ This is a rhetorical question because in his next statements Paul implies that they did not receive the Breath from out of their efforts to observe the written codes of Covenant law. This effectively constitutes Paul’s first general statement – 

Christians receive the Breath from out of hearing and entrustment

Paul continues his questioning of the Galatians. He says, ‘Given that you did not receive the Breath from out of your efforts to observe the written codes of Covenant law, is it that you are not thinking and understanding? You know that you began within Breath. So are you now being brought to completion within flesh?’ Paul is not merely talking about the Christian’s ultimate standing before God on Judgement Day. He is not merely talking about ‘justification’. He says that they ‘Began within faith’, but now Paul is concerned about how they are being brought to completion. In other words how are these Christians growing and maturing? How are they living their lives day-by day? 

Paul places Breath in contrast to flesh. As he says elsewhere, these oppose one another, their impetus and movement is in opposite directions. There we see his implied second general statement –

The movement of Breath and the energies of flesh oppose one another

The Hebrew Christians in Galatia had obviously experienced many things since they turned towards the Messiah, but Paul expresses his concern that such experiences may have been without purpose, that they are empty and without value because they do not have a proper basis. The proper basis is persuasion and entrustment in the Messiah. Seeking to maintain divine approval by expending energy and labour in observing the written codes of Covenant law is not a proper basis for divine approval or for maintaining cleanliness.

Galatians 2 v 20 – 21 - No judicial approval for people seeking to keep the law

 ‘I have been crucified together with His Anointed, but I am alive - no longer I [ego] - but His Anointed alive within me. And at this present time, what I am living within flesh, I am living this within faith, the Son of God having loved me and having surrendered himself above and beyond me. 21 I am absolutely not setting aside the free gift of God, because if judicial approval and right wise-ness [is] by means of law, then His Anointed died without cause’, (Galatians 2 v 20 – 21).

In verse 19 Paul made the general statement that –

‘I, [ego], by means of law, died to law, in order that I live to God’

Now Paul begins explain what he means and how this relates to the error of Peter, Barnabas and the other Christian Jews who were turning back to observing Sinai Covenant law. He says, ‘I have been crucified together with His Anointed, but I am alive’. In effect he begins to talk about his ‘old humanity’ and his ‘new humanity’ or new formation. He makes a similar statement in his letter to the Romans, ‘Knowing this, that our old human appearance is crucified together with [Jesus], in order that the body of self-forfeiture and loss is rendered down to being idle and inactive. We are no longer devotedly enslaved to the self-forfeiture and loss’, (Romans 6 v 6). In being brought forth by God, what he was, his natural, earthy fleshly constitution, has been crucified together with the Messiah. His old human appearance was tied and enslaved to energies, impulses and raw passions inherent within the fabric of his flesh. But when God brought him forth his old appearance changed. He died and yet he is alive. He has been brought forth as a new form, a ‘new self’. 

He says that he is no longer ‘I’ [ego]. What does he mean? ‘I’ is the locus of self-governance – ‘I’ choose, ‘I’ desire, ‘I’ think and feel. He means that he is no longer governing and regulating his speech and behaviour based on tied enslavement to the impulses and energies inherent within his fleshly constitution. Rather, by means of the Breath of God, the Messiah is alive within him and he has been set free from enslavement to self-forfeiture, in order to serve the Lord. The Lord is governing his speech and behaviour by means of the Breath within. Paul is no longer dead within fleshly unresponsiveness and insensitivity to God, but roused up from out of the dead towards responsiveness to God and Life in His Messiah by means of the Breath. 

Paul had not physically died, he was still living within his ‘vessel of clay’ or ‘earthly tent’. He was still existing within flesh, but now he was alive to God and living within entrustment and persuasion, a bond-slave of the Messiah, the anointed one of God ‘having loved me and having surrendered himself above and beyond me’. 

So how does this new ‘self’ relate to the behaviour of Peter and the other Hebrew Christians who were turning back to observing the written codes of Covenant law? Paul says, ‘I am absolutely not setting aside the free gift of God’. God brought Paul forth when he was in a helpless state. Paul did not have the ability to deliver himself from divine condemnation. His deliverance, his ‘bringing forth’ and ‘making alive’ is a free gift away from God, and away from His only-begotten Son ‘having loved me and having surrendered himself above and beyond me’ – above and beyond Paul’s ability. Paul says that he is not going to set aside this free gift. He is not going to dismiss it, which is what he would do of he went back to seeking to attain and maintain divine judicial approval by means of investing his labour and energy into observing the injunctions of the written codes of Covenant law.

The bottom line is this – ‘if judicial approval and right wise-ness [is] by means of law, then His Anointed died without cause’. 

If the means of attaining and maintaining divine approval is by means of observing Covenant law, by labouring to put into practice its written codes,

Then, if such a thing were possible, that is what God would have put in place.

But such a task is beyond the ability of anyone. More than this, if the means of deliverance and the maintenance of cleanliness was through obedience to the written codes of Covenant law, it would mean that the Messiah had died without purpose. His death would not have been necessary, it would have been superfluous, because this other method of deliverance and maintenance of cleanliness was already in place.

Galatians 2 v 17 – 19 - Jesus – Not a servant of self-forfeiture and loss

 ‘But if seeking judicial approval and being made rightwise within His Anointed, we ourselves have been found self-forfeiters, then is His Anointed a servant of self-forfeiture and loss? May it not come into being! 18 Because if I am once more constructing these what I have torn down and demolished, I am standing myself together with being contrary, 19 because I, [ego], by means of law, died to law, in order that I live to God’, (Galatians 2 v 17 - 19).

First, Paul anticipates a potential objection. Peter, Barnabas and other Jews in Galatia had sought judicial approval within the Messiah. But they were now in error, they were ‘not walking straight towards the truth of the gospel’, (verse 14). They were turning back to the written codes of Sinai Covenant law and insisting that male Gentile Christians also had to be circumcised in agreement with that law. The objection that Paul considers is this – If Christians are in error is the Messiah a servant of self-forfeiture? In not advocating circumcision, is the Messiah serving error? 

Paul replies, ‘May it never come to happen!’. So what is the situation with Peter, Barnabas and the Jewish Christians that have ‘shrunk back’? Paul answers by supposing a situation in which it is himself who is in error. He says ‘If I am once more constructing these that I have torn down and demolished…’. In heralding the gospel, Paul has torn down and demolished requirements that exist under the written codes of the Sinai Covenant. This is something that Christian legalists also struggle with. But it is clear that Paul is not demanding that male Gentile Christians had to be circumcised, and this is contrary to what is required under Sinai Covenant law. In the same way he was not insisting that Christians had to engage in making sacrifices, nor was he directing Christians to the Ten Commandments. So he says that if he now changes course and starts to once again insist on, and construct these practices – circumcision, sacrifices and directing to the written codes of Sinai Covenant law – things that he has previously torn down, then ‘I am standing myself together with being contrary’. In other words, ‘If I do this then I am being inconsistent and I am contradicting myself’. 

But if he insists on reinstating these practices that he has previously torn down, this is more than a simple ‘change of policy’ or a ‘U turn’. It contradicts Paul’s position as a Christian. Why? ‘Because I, [ego], by means of law, died to law, in order that I live to God’. This is consistent with what Paul says in Romans 7 v 4, where he says that the Christian’s ‘old self’ is put to death by the law that reveals his self-forfeiture and loss. Christians are placed in union with the Messiah by means of the Breath, and this means that they are crucified with him, but the law is brought to completion by means of the body of the Messiah as the Lamb of God without stain or blemish. The law, by means of the body of the Messiah, is brought to completion, penetrating into those who are placed in union with him becoming free, away from the law, to stand within divine judicial approval within the Messiah. They are roused up to Life with him by means of the Breath. Because they died within the Messiah, the written codes of Covenant law are rendered idle, and they are roused up from the dead as a ‘new self’.

Galatians 2 v 14 – 16 - The Christian challenge to legalists

 ‘But when I saw them not walking straight towards the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter in front of all, ‘If you, being a Jew first of all, are living like a Gentile and not like a Jew, why are you compelling the Gentiles to live like a Jew? 15 We [are] natural born Jews, and absolutely not from out of ethnic [Gentile] self-forfeiture and no share, 16 but we know that a man is absolutely not judicially approved or made rightwise from out of actions of law, if not by means of persuasion and entrusting Jesus His Anointed. We penetrate towards being faithfully persuaded of Jesus, His Anointed, to the point of obedience, in order that we are judicially approved and made rightwise from out of faith in His Anointed, not by means of law actions, because all flesh will not be judicially approved or made rightwise by means of law works’, (Galatians 2 v 14 – 16). 

Paul was not one to mince his words. He confronted Peter in front of everyone when he saw him acting contrary to the gospel, ‘not walking straight towards the truth of the gospel’. In what way was Peter in error? He was separating himself away from Christians who were Gentiles. But more than this, it would seem that Peter was aligning himself with the assertive, legalistic Jews who had recently arrived, and he was now compelling male Gentile Christians to be circumcised according to divine law. First of all, Paul exposes Peter’s inconsistency. He says, ‘You are first of all a Jew, and under the equality of the gospel you are living like a Gentile and not like a Jew. So why are you now compelling Gentiles to live like a Jew?’ Peter’s approach was a contradiction.

Then Paul, who was himself a Jew, reminds Peter of their heritage and their new position within the Messiah. Unlike Jewish proselytes, Paul and Peter are natural born Jews. They are not from out of the self-forfeiture of Gentiles. Paul and Peter both knew that if an individual is not judicially approved by means of persuasion and entrusting Jesus - God’s Anointed - then they are absolutely not judicially approved from out of his or her labours and efforts to observe the written codes of divine law, such as the requirement to be circumcised.  

Hebrew Christians, like Gentile Christians, penetrate towards being persuaded of Jesus, God’s Anointed, to the point of obedience. This means that Jews, like Gentiles, are judicially approved and made rightwise from out of faith – entrustment to the point of obedience - in His Anointed. Hebrew Christians are not judicially approved or made rightwise by means of law actions, says Paul, because all flesh will not be judicially approved or made rightwise by means of energy and work invested in trying to observe the requirements of the written codes of divine law. Even though Jews possess divine law and have this advantage over Gentiles, God will not judicially approve or make rightwise even one natural born Jewish individual as a result of them labouring and expending their energy in trying to observe the injunctions of divine law. 

Galatians 2 v 12, 13 - Christians and Jewish legalists – The problem stated

 ‘Before some came away from James, he [Peter] was eating with Gentiles. But when they came he shrunk back and separated himself, fearful of those from out of circumcision, 13 and the remainder of Jews also played the part with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away together with their acting the part’, (Galatians 2 v 12, 13). 

Paul states that because of the free gift of the Messiah, when it comes to Christians there is no difference between Jews and Gentiles. Previously, Jews, as God’s chosen ethnic group, separated themselves away from other nations, races and tribes – referred to in Scripture as ‘Gentiles’ or ‘Greeks’. Jews did not eat with Gentiles. But Peter, as a Christian Jew, had embraced what was for him this new equality and so he ate with Gentile Christians. 

But in Antioch, some Jews came away from James, though they were not necessarily authorised by him, (Acts 15 v 24), and they were emphatic in re-emphasising traditional Jewish practices, including Jews not eating with ‘unclean’ Gentile ‘outsiders’. They also emphasised the requirement of Covenant law, that males who were seeking to serve God were to be circumcised. This was originally an instruction to Abraham, patriarch of the Jews, and later this instruction was enshrined in the written codes of divine law. It was the first injunction for Jews and it was also a requirement for Gentile males who sought to embrace the worship and service of YHVH by becoming Jewish proselytes.

So when these rather assertive Jews appeared on the scene, Peter became fearful of them, and he shrunk back and separated himself from eating with Gentiles, contrary to the gospel. Then other Jewish or Hebrew Christians also began to behave in the same way, carried away by this fear and by what their fellow Jews were doing. Even Barnabas was caught up in this. But Paul was not happy with this situation at all.