Galatians 4 v 21 – 24a - Hagar and Sarah, allegories of two Covenants [1]

 ‘Tell me, those wishing to exist under law, are you not listening to and comprehending law? 22 Because it is written that Abraham had two sons, one from out of the slave girl, and one from out of the free, unbound woman. 23 But on the one hand, the from out of the slave girl was procreated down from flesh; but the from out of the free by means of an announced promise, 24 which are speaking allegorically, because these are two set arrangements’, (Galatians 4 v 21 – 24a).

After gathering his thoughts together, Paul has one last attempt to restore the Hebrew Christians who were turning back to Covenant law. He addresses them directly and begins to point out their inconsistency. You who are ‘wishing to exist under law, are you not listening to and comprehending law?’. He implies that they are turning to Covenant law but are not listening to it so as to hear or comprehend what it says. 

He turns their attention once again to their patriarch, Abraham, from whom Jews were keen to show their physical descent. Abraham was married to Sarah who was ‘barren’, or unable to bear children. Nevertheless, God announced a promise to Abraham that he would have a son. However, the promise of a son was not immediately fulfilled, and the years went by. So after a time, Abraham and Sarah concluded that since Sarah was barren, God must mean that Abraham would have a son by means of him entering into union with their slave-girl, making Hagar Abraham’s concubine. So Sarah gave Hagar to Abraham so that he would not be completely without descendants, and in this way fulfil God’s promise, (Genesis 16 v 3). The son of Abraham and Hagar was named Ishmael. But God told Abraham that Ishmael was not the announced promised son. In due course, contrary to expectation, Sarah became pregnant and gave birth to Isaac, who was the son of the announced promise. Thus Paul tells us, it is written that Abraham had two sons, one from out of the slave girl and one from out of the free, unbound woman’ (verse 22). The word ‘freewoman’ is never applied to Sarah in the story in Genesis, not even in the Genesis passage that is freely quoted later in verse 30, but it is an obviously true description, and it is introduced in complete fairness as an antithesis to Hagar. 

Abraham’s two sons are contrasted in this way –

   

Ishmael was procreated down from flesh

born a slave

Isaac by means of an announced promise

born free

Now why did Paul decide to look at the events surrounding Abraham and the birth of his two sons? It is because these two situations are ‘speaking allegorically, because these are two set arrangements’. Paul will go on to explain what he means. 

Galatians 4 v 12 – 20 - The Apostle Paul’s exasperation with Christians under the influence of legalists

 ‘I am imploring you brothers, become even like me, [ego], because I also am like you. You have wronged me in nothing. 13 But you know that by means of weakness of the flesh I previously announced and proclaimed the good news to you, 14 and within your putting my flesh to proof, not despising or treating with contempt, nor spitting out in disgust. But you received me like a messenger from God, like Jesus the anointed. 15 Therefore, where is your benefit? For I am bearing you witness, that if possible, your eyes having been gouged out, you would haven them to me. 16 So have I become your hateful enemy, speaking the truth to you? 17 They are not burning with passion after you in the right way, but are separating and excluding you. They wish that you might be passionate and zealous after them. 18 But it is good to be zealous within good and virtue at all times, and not only within my being present with you. 19 My children, whom I am once more labouring in birth pangs as far as that the anointed is formed and fashioned within you, 20 I am indeed wishing to be present with you at this moment and to be changing my tone, because I am without a way within you’, (Galatians 4 v 12 – 20).

Paul implores the Hebrew Christians to be like him because like them he is a Jew, and a Hebrew Christian, himself. Despite the strength of his letters, Paul was not an eloquent, gifted orator. He was described as ‘unimpressive in person’ and he declared the gospel in the weakness of his flesh, yet the Jews in Galatia received him with warmth and loyalty. But where is their benefit? Paul asks if he has become their hated enemy because he is speaking the truth to them. 

Paul then turns his attention to the Jews who had come into Galatia away from James – the ‘Judaizers’ who were leading Peter and Barnabas astray and insisting that male Gentile Christians be circumcised as required by Covenant law. These Jews were passionate, burning with zeal, focused and intense. But not in the right way, says Paul. By turning Hebrew Christians back to Covenant law, they were being divisive, separating and excluding Hebrew Christians away from Gentile Christians. He accuses these Jews as being self-interested and wanting their fellow countrymen to be passionate and zealous after them. Paul acknowledges that to be zealous at all times is praiseworthy, as long as such passion is within the boundaries of what is good and virtuous. He does not expect the Hebrew Christians to put on a zealous, passionate attitude for show only at the times when he was present with them.

If you are a Christian who has been or is exasperated in relating to Christian legalists, then you are not alone. Paul is exasperated with these Hebrew Christians who are being drawn back under Covenant law. He longs to be present with them, and he finds himself ‘once more labouring in birth pangs as far as that the anointed is formed and fashioned within you’. He is right back to basics with them, seeking to be present with them to assist in bringing them forth so that the Messiah is formed and fashioned within them, then he can change his tone and manner with them. Finally he says ‘I am without a way within you’. He does not know what to do or say next. 

Galatians 4 v 9 – 11 - Legalism - Christians turning to Covenant law is a backward step

 ‘But at this present time, having known God, or rather, having been known under God, how are you turning back once more on the basis of weak and destitute basic principles which you are desiring to be enslaved to afresh once more? 10 You are scrupulously observing days, months, seasons and years. 11 I am fearful for you in case I have perhaps laboured towards you penetrating into no purpose’, (Galatians 4 v 9 – 11).

Paul applies what he has just been saying to those Hebrew Christians who were turning back to the written codes of Covenant law. He says, ‘At this present time, you know God – or to put it in a better way, you have been known under God – so why are you turning back? Why are you going backwards, turning back once more on the basis of weak, destitute, rudimentary principles? (Galatians 3 v 23, 24; 4 v 1 – 3). Why do you desire to be enslaved to the Sinai Covenant, it’s written codes of law, and human nature once again?’ 

What is it that these Hebrew Christians were doing? They were ‘scrupulously observing days, months, seasons and years’. They were being very careful in observing Jewish Sabbaths and other fasting-days or festivals right down to observing specific single days. Jews had also added many other days, such as commemorating the destruction and rebuilding of the temple, and other important events in their history. Then there was the observance of the first day of the month, the new moon, and they were also paying close attention to seasons, such as the Passover, Pentecost, and the Feast of Tabernacles. They were observing years, such as the sabbatical year, which was about the time of the writing this Epistle, and the year of jubilee. 

Paul sums this situation up by saying ‘I am fearful for you in case I have perhaps laboured towards you penetrating into no purpose’. These Hebrew Christians had gone so far backwards down this route of observing the law that they had reached a point where Paul wondered whether they were Christians after all. He begins to speculate whether his endeavours have been without purpose, without a viable result.

Galatians 4 v 4 – 8 - Christians – adopted sons and heirs

 ‘But when the completion of the season had come, God sent away His son, having  come into being from out of a woman, having come into being under law, 5 in order that he buy back those under law, in order that we receive placing as a son. 6 And because you are sons, God sends forth the Breath of His Son penetrating into our hearts, our deep inner core, crying aloud and shrieking ‘Abba, Father!’. 7 So therefore, you are no longer existing a slave, but if a son by means of God, also an heir, allotted a share. 8 But indeed, at that time, absolutely not knowing God, you were the enslaved by nature, lest being gods’, (Galatians 4 v 4 - 8). 

Paul has just said that Jews existed like under-age heirs, enslaved under the orderly system of rudimentary elements and first principles of the Sinai Covenant with its written codes of law, until the time appointed by the Father. That season of under-age enslavement of Jews was completed when ‘God sent away His son’. The only-begotten Son pre-existed his ‘coming into being from out of a woman’. Indeed, the Son of God is ‘the image of the invisible God, firstborn of the whole in terms of the individual parts of what is originally formed’, (Colossians 1 v 15). ‘By means of him all came into being, and apart from him, not even one was caused to be that has come into being’, (John 1 v 3). Thus ‘God sent away His son’ from out of the heavenly realm to ‘come into being from out of a woman, having come into being under law’. God’s purpose was ‘that [His son] buy back those under law, in order that we receive placing as a son'. The details of this forms the details of the gospel or ‘good news’ of course. But Paul is not interested here in explaining the gospel in detail. He is interested to present the concept of ‘sonship’, because ‘if children, also heirs, indeed, God’s heirs, and fellow-heirs with the Messiah’, (Romans 8 v 17). 

But there is more, ‘because you are sons, God sends forth the Breath of His Son penetrating into our hearts, our deep inner core’. Over the course of his writings, Paul places two pairs of principles that are in opposition to one another - 

     Covenant Law vs God’s Promise (Galatians)

    Fleshly impulses towards death vs Breath penetrating into Life (Romans 7, 8)

The Breath of the Messiah penetrating within the Christian’s heart, including the heart or deep inner core of Hebrew Christians, is ‘crying aloud and shrieking ‘Abba, Father!’. 

Paul then reaches his conclusion in verses 7 and 8. ‘So therefore, you are no longer existing a slave, but if a son by means of God, also an heir, allotted a share. 8 But indeed, at that time, absolutely not knowing God, you were the enslaved by nature, lest being gods’ 

Paul’s conclusion is that Jews who are entrusting the Messiah are adopted sons and fellow heirs with the Messiah as a result of God fulfilling His promises through giving His only-begotten son and His Breath. Hebrew Christians are no longer enslaved to Covenant law, and no longer ‘the enslaved by nature’, by the impulses of their flesh. Why? Because of the opposing impetus and movement of the Breath of God within them in their deepest inner core. But previously, before entrusting the Messiah, Jews were enslaved, by their own human nature. Paul then adds sarcastically, ‘lest being gods’ – unless you Jews were gods with superhuman ability and strength. 

Galatians 4 v 1 – 3 - Divine law – A rudimentary system for infants

 ‘Now on this basis I am saying however long the time that the heir, existing owner of all, is an infant, he is carried across nothing different than a slave, 2 existing rather under tutors and house managers up until the time appointed beforehand by the father. 3 In this manner we also, were enslaved at the time we existed infants, under the row of rudiments of the ordered system’, (Galatians 4 v 1 - 3).   

Paul has just said that Hebrew Christians, like Gentile Christians, exist as Abraham’s seed (plural), heirs down from God’s announced promise. Having introduced the concept of heirs of the divine inheritance, he now begins to expand on this theme. 

He presents the illustration of a single heir who is still not yet of sufficient age to take full control of what he possesses. Such a young infant heir may own everything, but he is carried across just like a slave. Because he is still a child, he does not make decisions about buying and selling his possessions or about investments. Such decisions are made on his behalf and he has no say in the matter. He is under the authority of trustees – of house managers and governors. He does as he is told until he reaches the age, determined by his father, that he is able to take full control and possession of his inheritance. 

Paul then applies this to Jews, ‘In this manner we also’. Although they were God’s chosen ethnic group, Jews nevertheless existed as infants before the Messiah came. They were like children enslaved to the rudimentary, first principles of the ordered system.  The ‘ordered system’ is that of the Sinai Covenant with its written codes of law, as he says later, ‘scrupulously observing days, months, seasons and years’. 

Many translations read, ‘enslaved under the basic principles of the world’, but the word ‘world’ is not present in the Greek. The word ‘stoicheion’ means ‘rudimentary elements’, ‘orderly arrangement’, or ‘first principles’, and though often associated with the world so as to mean ‘the orderly arrangement of the world’ it does not necessarily refer to ‘the world’. Paul is talking here to Jews. The context of these verses is that Paul is talking to Jewish Christians about the law. So I suggest that the Sinai Covenant and its written codes of laws is the orderly system of rudimentary elements and first principles that Jews were enslaved under, existing like under-age heirs until the time appointed by the Father – the coming of the promised Messiah. This interpretation seems to be confirmed by what Paul says next.